• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 days ago

    It’s because there is a large, internally-polled segment of the Pennsylvania electorate who are Jewish and sympathetic to Israel.

    Harris can’t afford to not court them.

    I have no doubt she vehemently dislikes Bibi and would wish to cut aid.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      Not only that, but AIPAC is a serious force that has demonstrated their willingness to aggressively smear every candidate who speaks out against Israel; they’ve already done this for a number of races.

      Harris is basically trapped here. The best thing she can do is stay vague until after the election, when she might actually have the power to do something about it. No one on Palestine’s side has anything to gain from her losing votes over it.

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        16 days ago

        Yeah this is basically my thoughts as well. Stuck between Iraq and a hard place (I had to do the Hot Shots joke here… too fitting).

        But seriously, AIPAC has way too much power in American politics. And your comment about Palestine is spot on. She is walking a very thin line, but this is the nature of politics and nuance. That orange fucker has no clue about any of this.

      • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        This is the correct reason and the reason why the genocide will continue no matter who is elected.

        Aipac has bought enough of american politicians that it has rendered votes worthless.

        People should vote on matters other than this for with any outcome US sponsored genocide is inevitable.