Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-212 hours agotension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down16
arrow-up1115arrow-down1external-linktension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgArthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-212 hours agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squarewinterayars@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down4·6 hours agoIt’s blatantly obvious and non-controversial what they’re doing. That’s why.
minus-squarebasmati@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·59 minutes agoExcluding developers because of arbitrary sections issued by the most war mongering country in at least the last 10,000 years is not non-controversial, as it turns out.
It’s blatantly obvious and non-controversial what they’re doing. That’s why.
Excluding developers because of arbitrary sections issued by the most war mongering country in at least the last 10,000 years is not non-controversial, as it turns out.