That’s what I meant, you’re making the joke from the perspective of a person that doesn’t realize there’s an octopus in the game, even though there is one.
And the reason I said it’s confusing is because the game title is only perceived by the player of the game, and the player is explicitly told/shown that you’re playing as an octopus. So the perspective used in the joke is impossible, but I understand that I’m being pedantic, feel free to ignore my ramblings caused by the uncontrollable urge to point out the inconsistency.
> Grand Theft Auto: Vice City
> Not a single vice to be found
> House Flipper
> All houses are orientated normally
> Untitled Goose Game
> Has title
> Octodad
> Absolutely not a single octopus in the game whatsoever
> Golf With Your Friends
> No friends.
Oh wow, now I want to make one of those physics gimmick games where you fire houses out of a trebuchet.
Because of the use of the superior siege engine, I thoroughly approve.
I was thinking Vice City, no vices?? But I think I get what sort of vice you mean now
For anyone else who still doesn’t understand!
Right, but that is a vise, not a vice.
With Octodad joke, are you implying that you didn’t see through the disguise? If so, I don’t think it fits with the rest and is confusing, tbh.
Not so much that I didn’t see through the disguise, more that the running joke of the game is that nobody else sees it other than the chef.
That’s what I meant, you’re making the joke from the perspective of a person that doesn’t realize there’s an octopus in the game, even though there is one.
And the reason I said it’s confusing is because the game title is only perceived by the player of the game, and the player is explicitly told/shown that you’re playing as an octopus. So the perspective used in the joke is impossible, but I understand that I’m being pedantic, feel free to ignore my ramblings caused by the uncontrollable urge to point out the inconsistency.