Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not ridiculous at all. Imputed rent is part of why owning your own home is a good investment. You can’t live in your shares of GameStop!

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can’t live in your shares of GameStop!

      But no one is saying you can or comparing the two things.

      • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s not the point. I’m just trying to explain that imputed rent is real. By owning and possessing housing you are receiving income from it in the form of imputed rent. It is the savings on the rent you would otherwise have to pay if someone else owned the property you possess instead of you.

        • Whirlybird
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          By owning and possessing housing you are receiving income from it in the form of imputed rent

          You’re not receiving income. That’s a completely made up ridiculous term.