Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • Whirlybird
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can’t live in your shares of GameStop!

    But no one is saying you can or comparing the two things.

    • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not the point. I’m just trying to explain that imputed rent is real. By owning and possessing housing you are receiving income from it in the form of imputed rent. It is the savings on the rent you would otherwise have to pay if someone else owned the property you possess instead of you.

      • Whirlybird
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        By owning and possessing housing you are receiving income from it in the form of imputed rent

        You’re not receiving income. That’s a completely made up ridiculous term.