Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 hours agoSquare!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1811arrow-down124
arrow-up1787arrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up97·edit-27 hours agoKinda forgot the sides being parallel part. Like missing a step in assembling IKEA furniture, its not gonna turn out right.
minus-squareSomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up51·8 hours agoYou don’t normally need to specify that the sides are parallel if you specify four right angles.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·8 hours agoAlso pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·6 hours agoThis one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down9·6 hours agoNo, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.” Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·5 hours agoOK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·5 hours agoWell then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·5 hours agoWhy? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·4 hours agoWithout a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoThe cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 hours agoFun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so tgat checks out.
minus-squareStopJoiningWars@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·3 hours agoI hope for you that you’re high.
Kinda forgot the sides being parallel part. Like missing a step in assembling IKEA furniture, its not gonna turn out right.
You don’t normally need to specify that the sides are parallel if you specify four right angles.
Also pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.”
Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so tgat checks out.
I hope for you that you’re high.