Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 小时前Square!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1812arrow-down124
arrow-up1788arrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 12 小时前message-square87fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·8 小时前Also pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·6 小时前This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down9·6 小时前No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.” Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·5 小时前OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·5 小时前Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·5 小时前Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·4 小时前Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 小时前The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 小时前Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so tgat checks out.
minus-squareStopJoiningWars@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·3 小时前I hope for you that you’re high.
Also pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.”
Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost a right angle to the contiguous void.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so tgat checks out.
I hope for you that you’re high.