• hate2bme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’m voting Democrat and I see nothing wrong with this. Yeah it may take time but at least it’ll be an accurate count. I think every vote should be hand counted.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      The problem is that the people making this decision are a bunch of conspiracy-mongers who aren’t able to provide money to actually count the ballots. The point isn’t just to make it slow; it’s to create opportunity to conspiracy-monger and choose to not certify the results at all, so that peoples’ votes aren’t counted, and the Republicans can just install whomever they feel like in power.

      • hate2bme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Why does there need to be a rush to have them certified? We don’t have to know the winner on election Day. I’d rather it be correct and accurate than instant. How can you be against accuracy?

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          There isn’t a rush to do it; the problem is that their plan is to invent nonexistent problems and refuse to certify at all.

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Pretty much. Only way to stop it is for Democrats to have an overwhelming win so that things don’t come down to corrupt officials in a few states.