Republican vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance has shared some details about the Trump-Vance campaignā€™s health care plan, and it appears to allow insurers to charge more for preexisting conditions.

Vance gave details on NBCā€™sĀ Meet the Press on Sunday, where heĀ toldĀ Kristen Welker that Donald Trumpā€™s plan involves ā€œderegulating insurance markets, so that people can actually choose a plan that makes sense for them.ā€

This would appear to roll back some of the Affordable Care Act, which got rid of insurance companiesā€™ ability to deny coverage based on preexisting conditions. Prior to President Obamaā€™s legislation, it was difficult to get affordable health care coverage except through Medicare, Medicaid, or employer-based plans. While health care plans were available outside of that, insurers sought profits by weeding out people likely to require medical care.


šŸ—³ļø Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    Ā·
    2 months ago

    Vance said that under Donald Trumpā€™s plan, Americans wouldnā€™t be put ā€œinto the same risk pools.ā€ In other words, healthier young people wouldnā€™t be in the same risk pool as older people more likely to need medical care, lowering costs for younger Americans.

    If this statement is true to their plan thereā€™s a bigger implication that should worry more than 50% of Americans.

    Americans wouldnā€™t be put ā€œinto the same risk pools.ā€

    Men wouldnā€™t be in the same risk pool as women. Guess which group has higher overall health insurance because one group has a much more complicated and functional reproductive system?

    For those that donā€™t remember life before the reforms put in place, men were charged a small fraction of health insurance premiums compared to women. I remember as a young man when I learned this by comparing my pay stub with a woman coworker that was the same age as me at the time. We were both in our early 20s. To reiterate; we were the same age, same employer, same insurance company, same plan, the only difference was gender.

    I was paying $23 every two weeks. She was paying $110.

    I was shocked and embarrassed. I fully supported the reforms that lead men and women to paying equal rates even though that meant I had to pay much more than I had in the past.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      That would literally drive me out of the country. Both of my children have special needs and I hit my out of pocket maximum almost every year.