• flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    1 month ago

    The rule is buy the default-gendered variant. If there a special “men’s section” or “women’s section” for a certain product category it means you’ll be ripped off.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a lot more than socks. Went looking for a duffel coat once for work and checked both isles in stores. Mens coat - nice woven and well fulled 100 percent wool, thick quality stuff, Women’s isle, cheaper felted wool half the thickness… Same price, same basic style, same store.

        Ever since whenever I go looking for stuff I check both isles. Higher quality fabrics are generally reserved for men’s items though women’s stuff is priced the same. You’d never know the difference if you only shopped one gendered option.

        • odelik@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Off-topic comment.

          I appreciate the misuse of isle instead of aisle. The mental imagery of navigating around stores compromised of isles makes me want to go shopping so I can go on an island hopping adventure looking for booty to haul back to my kingdom.

        • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Apart from fashionistas, “standard” men’s style is far more static. Cuts, materials, colors, and patterns don’t deviate far from the baseline from year to year, so garments tend to be a bit sturdier and longer lasting.

          As an example, picture a guy in a Henley, cargo shorts, and work boots. What decade is he from? Okay, now put him in straight leg jeans and a flannel shirt. Was this picture taken yesterday? In the 90s? 2005? Who knows, guys have been wearing that for ages, and will be for ages to come.

          However, pre-pandemic I think high-waist flares were one of the main jeans trends for women. Five years later, it’s low-waist straight-leg, right? Or have they shifted back to skinny jeans? I think early-2010s was the last time capris were the statement look, but hell, I truly don’t know. The point is, women’s styles seem to change not only year-to-year but season-to-season. Today’s trend is tomorrow’s faux pas is next week’s retro is next month’s vintage… sure, I’m exaggerating, but women’s fashion does lend itself more to sweeping change.

          The criminal part is that woman-specific options are underconstructed and overpriced compared to men’s clothing. That, and the lack of pockets. Seriously, my heart goes out to anyone who wears clothing targeted to women. I’d be fucking lost without pockets.

          • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            The criminal part is that woman-specific options are underconstructed and overpriced compared to men’s clothing. That, and the lack of pockets. Seriously, my heart goes out to anyone who wears clothing targeted to women. I’d be fucking lost without pockets.

            Trans girl who sews her own clothing here: I’ve honestly stopped bothering to add pockets to my clothes, because my handbag has REALLY grown on me and takes care of most of the need. Seeing all the guys doing pocket-checks, when I just grep my handbag and have everything in it is almost getting funny at this point. 😊

            That said: Fuck the fashion industry, for so many reasons, including for what they did to fashion! Like: Even if we ignored all the human-rights abuses, the trash quality that they produce, the needlessly bad impact on the environment and all of these things, and we really shouldn’t(!!), I just assume most people here have already heard about those, that industry still has no fucking idea of what personal style is and how to support it. It’s a bunch of business-assholes that decide that some thing X is “in” and then you get only that, with the difference between X and the previous X being minute details in the cut, but it still remains the same concept of short, narrow skirt for example.

            You are looking for a ankle-length circle-skirt (=flat lying skirt, very wide)? Tough luck, sew it yourself, nobody offers that! You want a long dress with long sleeves? Yeah, that doesn’t exist! (Unless you sew it yourself, like I have, which gave me the most comfortable piece of nightwear I’ve ever owned that I’m even somewhat comfortable to wear in public if I add a visual seperation with some form of belt.) I could go on…

            In short: The fashion industry has sold people on the insane idea that jeans with a slightly different cut are a different clothing-style. They are not!

          • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I suppose that assumes a woman cares about fashion and that fast fashion is something every woman wants to buy into. A lot of women I know shop vintage because they want items they can wear reliably for years and modern items do not offer that level of quality. If you want to buy out of the fast fashion assumption of “need” it seems like you have to literally go back in time because if you buy fast fashion it is literally trash in a year. Nobody will thrift it worn because it will be worn out. It doesn’t seem like brands have options for women that lie outside of this system in addition to those junky options or offer those junk items at a lower cost. If all you can buy new is junk then stepping outside of the system requires you to avoid the ease of simply buying new off the rack. It requires work and luck. If you grew up inside that system that’s your established normal.

            We can say that mens fashion is static… But why can’t both gendered fashion silos have more static options or at least price fast fashion at a different price point to reflect those cheaper materials? It seems like saying one sex has inherent requirements for fubgibillity which seems honestly kinda sexist. There’s a lot of men who want more interesting fad like stuff and women who want staples that will last a decade.

            • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Oh, I full-on agree, hence that final paragraph. I’m one of those idgaf-about-fads types, but I know plenty of folks who do care and who get hosed by the system as it currently exists. Fashion as a whole is pretty much a racket as far as I’m concerned. But what isn’t these days?

              The reason they won’t price fast fashion bs lower is because they don’t have to. Trendy things sell at inherently predatory price points, then they declare a new “what’s hot” before the sales drop off. Capitalism is a mfer, and folks are exploited at every rung of the fashion ladder.

              I guess that would change if enough people stopped buying in, but do either of us see that happening any time soon? I don’t, and as frustrating as it is, I think you don’t, either. So garments marketed primarily to women remain pocketless and flimsy, and those marketed primarily to my-tastes-don’t-change men continue to trend towards work-wearish looks that are at least marginally sturdier at roughly equivalent cost.

              Except for those goddamn fishing shirts. Who decided that was a thing? They’re terrible.

      • Sprinks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        From my experience all of mens clothes have higher durability. I could just be buying shitty clothes, but ill have ripped stitches and fallen buttons a week after purchase while my husband is still sporting the same 15 year old wardrobe with minimal damage. My shirts are so thin i can see clear through them and would need to layer 3 to match my husband’s shirts. I dont purchase them off amazon/temu/etc, but it feels like that’s where they came from most of time.

  • Sabata@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just want to smell like something other than tree, cold tree, or beach episode tree.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’d prefer not to have any smell, but that is apparently really hard to do.

      And why do all products for men have to look like I’m cosplaying a sci-fi tactical commando?

      • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I assume having no smell is really hard to do and to cover up the slight chemical smell they put a stronger smell over it. That being said I am definitely not a deodorant taste tester so 🤷‍♀️

      • Shapillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have persistent skin issues (psoriasis) and most specialized products are unscented.

        This may be the singular upside to this situation ^^`

        • theredbit@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          You are not alone. I have bad eczema and my wife has psoriasis as well and all of our care products are mostly scent free. At this point I think I’d rather not smell like sandalteakvanilla beach wood lol

      • Exulion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I also prefer to have no smell, speed stick makes a unscented deodorant and I have a scentless body wash, havent found a good shampoo yet though. Just using head and shoulders.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I found that out when I had an allergy skin patch test and found out one of the things I’m sensitive too is fragrance. The most important thing was finding a hair dye that I’m not allergic too but after 10 years, I’m starting to get a little itchy when I get my hair done.

      • Sabata@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hear me out, gunpowder and ozone so you smell like what astronaut say space smells like.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ahh, you are a manly man and ready for Duke Cannon Naval Supremacy bar soap or perhaps Victory! is more for you.

        ***Google Duke Cannon for an amusing marketing strategy of men’s products. Who doesn’t want a Big Ass Bar of Soap?

    • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      One day I plan to enter the cologne phase of life but it hasn’t happened yet. I like smells but I don’t like mall shopping.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        As long as you buy the right size it shouldn’t be an issue, most clothing in standardized sizes aren’t much different between the genders besides the number being different (a men’s size S will be a women’s size M) so as long as you get the size right it’ll be fine.

        Edit: Size comparison flipped the wrong way, fixed it.

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah I just realized my mistake of getting them backwards, I just fixed it. Glad I was still able to make the point even though I made an embarrassing mistake 😅

    • deltapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Jokes on you, the buttons will be on the wrong side! Ahahahahaha

      Edit: yes I know t-shirts don’t have buttons. Bad attempt at humour. Not deleting because I stand behind my mistakes.

    • limonade@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Me frequently accidentally finding myself in the men isles after finally finding a top with a high neckline.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have a nice Pikachu hoodie which said it’s for women on the site I ordered it from but I didn’t care because it’s cute and I liked it. The only thing that’s mildly annoying is having to think about the sizing difference (which I guess is kind of the point of the separate sizing numbers, just to be that extra bit of annoying for people who want it anyway).

    • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It depends, I find that many of the Men’s products can smell more “normal” and less rich.

      But then there’s old spice – which I use daily but I don’t think is as pleasant as women’s deodorant scents (but generally work better in antiperspirant imo so it’s not worth thinking too much about.)

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Me buying women’s vitamins because they’re the only ones with iron at the local dollar store.

    • dion_starfire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s actually a really good reason for that. The body doesn’t have a good way to get rid of excess iron except by bleeding, so it’s fairly easy for someone without a period to get iron poisoning from vitamins with iron in them. Women’s vitamins assume the person taking them loses a significant quantity of blood every month. Not only should men not take them, women whose birth control eliminates their period completely shouldn’t take them either.

    • Sprinks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      This isnt entirely related, but your comment made me think about the time I went into CVS to buy multivitamins and noticed all of the “men’s” included a picture of an orange while the “women’s” did not. All the other fruit pictured were the same between the two, but not oranges.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Earlier this year a doctor advised us (male and female) to take prenatal vitamins, and yesterday a nutritionist told us the same. They really just have everything anybody needs, apparently.

    • zod000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I did that with buying “one-a-day” vitamins for seniors because they were a quarter the price of standard men’s vitamins. I checked the stats and ingredients, they were about identical and from the same brand.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    And by higher quality they mean jammed full of things that don’t actually enhance the product but just act as fillers to make it seem fancy

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        still smell better than anything men’s deoderants put out.

        Want to have a musk like a spiced up skunk in a damp forest? Then right this way, gents!

  • rockhstrongo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    Me at the grocery store yesterday: “These cookies look delicious! And they’re 90% off!”

    Wife: “Those are lactation cookies…”

    Me: “I didn’t know that was a thing… They still look good though…”

        • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          why did they have to take that name for a milk boosting plant and not the name of an elete squad of cyber astronauts or something :/

        • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I call bullshit on this kind of product! This just reminds me too much of the phytoestrogens that ruthless scammers sell on places like Amazon to trick uninformed trans girls into giving them money and believing they receive some medication, when it does nothing whatsoever for them.

          The only “phytoestrogens” that actually do something are “phytoestrogens” sold by trusted homebrewers that are labeled that way to avoid seizure at the border.

          In order to achieve medical effects, you need proper medication, in this case probably Prolactin. (I’d have to check to make sure, but there are plenty of reports of trans women who succesfully induced lactation medically to feed their kids and had no problem whatsoever after that point.)

        • devilish666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ohh…i see
          Sad thing it’s not cookies that came from tits (or breast milk)
          But at least with that miracle cookies i can make the real lactation cookies

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s naturally meant for someone who is breastfeeding and contains nutrients which would be helpful in that process, though ultimately they are just food, for someone who isn’t breastfeeding the extra ingredients don’t have any effect (it’s not like they’ll cause lactation in males if that’s what you’re wondering).

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I judge my body wash on the basis of if it can clean my antiperspirant off by the end of the day. (Shower at night before bed). Many men’s body wash require you to do a lot to get it to clean… Tried a seasonal pomegranate something one aimed at women one time and it smelled great and I hardly had to do anything more than just apply it. Win win. Then I never found it again. Dove products are cheap usually near me, some are terrible, some are amazing. I’m sure if I was smarter I’d read the ingredients and figure out what works best and verify it was in the new product, but maybe I’ll leave that for next year.

      • General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just use regular non-antiperspirant deodorant. Anti-perspirant is bad for you and for your skin. It just forces your body to try even harder to sweat through it on top of the questionable chemistry. If you have a particular issue with the stank, just keep some with you or keep it at work to re-up. Not only will your armpits thank you, but so will your shirts. You can do that or keep using harsh chemicals for your armpits, harsh chemicals to get their residue off, and go through clothing like it’s toilet paper—or give your body the chance it hasn’t had since puberty to maybe cool off a bit. Give it a whirl.

        • HereIAm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t know what anti perspirants you’ve been using, but Rituals ones don’t stain or leave residue on any of my clothes.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I just assume that if it cleans off harder to remove substances like antiperspirant, it also would remove the oils and what not easier that get on me elsewhere. Grease, whatever. Need to remove oils from ivy, id rather it comes off easy and not have to find out a missed a spot. Convenience is a lazy man’s paradise.

  • Cock_Inspecting_Asexual@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Mens boots, cargo shorts, overalls, and hats are a god damn vibe. Just the sheer fucking quality.

    WHY CANT I HAVE THE LUXURY OF AQUIRING GOOD CARGO SHORTS!! WHYYYY

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      My boots’ gender is work. I’m the lady in steel toe work boots regardless of where I am because it’s both an aesthetic and because they’re broken in

    • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      As a man I wish I had more options. the JCP Pennys near has like two and a half floors of womens clothes and small mens section that takes up the last half.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m a woman who buys my tshirts in the men’s section because all women’s shirts have become crop tops, or are too low cut to wear to work, or too tight fitting to be comfortable. It looks like we have a lot of options, but I think it’s more like we have a lot of non utilitarian options. Like a bunch of clothes you can’t do anything in. Like go hiking, or bend over to pick up something you dropped without exposing yourself.

        I can get a men’s tshirt at target that fits exactly how I want it to(not too short, my boobs aren’t hanging out, not too baggy either) for about $8-$10. A women’s ‘tshirt’ will cost $15 plus and have all the issues I mentioned before.

        But then again I guess the grass is always greener right?

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Womens clothes so often suck in terms of quality compared to men’s. My partner is nb, but fits women’s clothes best… They can’t find suits of anything like the kind of quality you can for men’s. Certainly not in more than a couple of styles.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Shampoo, body wash, laundry detergent, engine degreaser, drain cleaner, ant poison and steak sauce.

      • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        “𝓣𝓱𝓲𝓼 𝓕𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻 𝓦𝓪𝓼𝓱™︎ 𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓰𝓷𝓮𝓭 𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓵𝓵𝔂 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓾𝓹𝓹𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽 𝓸𝓯 𝔂𝓸𝓾𝓻 𝓵𝓮𝓯𝓽 𝓮𝔂𝓮𝓫𝓻𝓸𝔀.”

  • ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Cheaper? My ass.

    Men’s depilatory cream costs around 30% more here, and it’s the same product, except with a slightly different fragrance.

    Most of the time I buy women’s products because they are both cheaper and of higher quality.

    This, in my case, is true for everything except razor blades.

    • Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Good point, razor blades for thicker hair makes a discernable difference. Luckily, double edged safety razor and a steel handle make this category practically free now

      • homura1650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have very course facial hair and switching to women’s razors pretty much solved my post-shave irritation problem. In order of quality for my face it goes: men’s disposable razor << safty razor < women’s disposable razor.

        • Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh interesting! I’ll have to check it out, thanks 🧔‍♀️ some women’s razors I’ve used in the past had a rather unpleasant glide strip that feels really slimy to me, but that may be a technological advantage haha

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fun fact:

    The same ingredient is cheaper in monostat (for womens bits) than it is in tenactin/etc (for men’s feeet/bits)

    • gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They’re different, Monistat is miconazole and Tinactin is tolnaftate. Plus, tolnaftate should never be used vaginally, just as an aside.

  • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Or: “Men buying women’s hygiene products, because they exist.”

    It’s really hard for me to find some stuff at all.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    At wal mart: “blue Equate brand men’s loofah $2” “blue Equate brand women’s loofah $1”

    That’s not how this is supposed to work.