Centurion@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · edit-218 hours agoIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldCenturion@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · edit-218 hours agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareoberstoffensichtlich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-212 hours agoLooks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0. B
minus-squareaffiliate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 hours agoif n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair. (this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)
Looks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0.
B
if n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair.
(this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)