• Lasherz12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    With something like 50% appointment rate, largely due to uncontested elections. In other words, less than 250 run compared to 520k other party contenders. This is less than .05% green, yet they think they should be on 100% of presidential races.

      • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not what I implied at all… Defensive much?

        A party that is only interested in moonshots isn’t a serious party.

        • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          A party that is only interested in moonshots isn’t a serious party.

          I just gave you a list that shows that they run in other elections.

            • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              The percentage a party receives in elections doesn’t automatically reflect its seriousness, especially when a political system is structured to suppress alternatives.

              Ok, so what’s the “magic number” for a party to be taken seriously in your eyes, and how can they possibly reach it when the two major parties manipulate the rules, funding, and media access to keep third parties down?

              Bruh, even in this very forum, Lemmy users often resort to guilt, pressure, and insults to force people into supporting the duopoly, calling those who back third parties “idiots” instead of fostering genuine political diversity. As I know from personal experience. lol