https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/2135509
this is practically a child’s view of the world. good guy vs bad guy. Russia = bad, NATO = good. plus, someone should tell her she has it completely backwards: ending russia is kinda natos entire thing
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/2135509
this is practically a child’s view of the world. good guy vs bad guy. Russia = bad, NATO = good. plus, someone should tell her she has it completely backwards: ending russia is kinda natos entire thing
bombing Poland? nah thats all you. what reason would Russia have to bomb Poland?
Removed by mod
You have a backward view of history, without NATO there wouldn’t have been a fascist coup in Ukraine in 2014, which wouldn’t have led to a vicious civil war between Ukrainian Russian speakers and nazi banderites, which then wouldn’t have led to a Russian invasion
Also ignores the fact Putin and Yeltsin wanted to join NATO, open a fuckin history book this shit ain’t that complex
Thank you NATO for building a house of skulls in Cambodia.
ur drawing way too many conclusions out of thin air. certainly they would bomb military supply lines, and those are valid military targets. but “bombing Poland” has a much more radical connotation. Russia has no reason to “bomb Poland”
You are just guessing. If Poland wasn’t already directly involved, attacking them would probably be a bad move compared to just cutting off the weapon supply with targeted attacks in western Ukraine.