• redisdead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    3 months ago

    How is a mayor responsible for junkies and mentally unstable people unfit for society?

    What do you want them to do?

      • redisdead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        3 months ago

        How many homeless people do you let crash on your couch and eat out of your fridge?

        Or is it only ok if someone else pays for it?

        • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          The issue is that tax payers are already paying for it. It cost money for cops to go out and arrest people, then process them. The homeless person ain’t going to show up to court later, and the tax payer usually eats the cost of all that plus any anti homeless benches or windows.

          I think if that the cost gets directed toward housing and food, so they have a stable place to grow from, it would be a better option in the long run.

              • redisdead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Step 1) defund police to provide free house and food to socially unfit people
                Step 2) socially unfit people trash the place because that’s what junkies do.
                Step 3) omg what is the police doing
                Step 4) it’s defunded.
                Step 5) who could have seen it coming?

                • RusAD@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  And your solution is, let me guess:

                  Step 1) make up a situation to be mad at.
                  Step 2) get mad at it.
                  Step 3) ???
                  Step 4) allow police to hunt homeless people for sport.

                  Now, to be serious, step 2 in your example is a lie fed to you by the police state in order to manufacture fear of homeless people and justify its own existence. Therefore the rest of your post is bullshit as well. And when your neighbor has a mental health crisis, you should call social services and doctors, not the police. The fact that your first instinct is to punish and incarcerate mentally unwell people instead of helping them to get better says a lot about your current mindset actually.

                  • redisdead@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    step 2 in your example is a lie fed to you by the police state

                    Lmao dude you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about

                    Stop daydreaming about your perfect world where everyone is happy fun land all the time nice and fun and butterflies.

                    There’s a social program in my city where you agree to host homeless people for some time and the city pays half the rent + they waive some property taxes

                    I didn’t do it because I’m not an idiot, every single one of my friends stopped doing it after their first time.

                    You only get half the rent because whoever you’re hosting doesn’t actually have to pay the other half, and the other benefits you get don’t get remotely close to covering rehabilitation of the apt when the contract runs out you’re finally able to rent to normal folks.

                    One of my buddies had shit on the ceiling. Like actual human feces, smears all over the ceiling.

              • redisdead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                You will, because you’ll need to evict the junkies out of the place they’re trashing.

        • webadict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Currently, my taxes go into destroying homeless encampments and arresting them, so we could probably use that money for housing and feeding them instead.

        • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I know this is a classical bad faith argument and doesn’t warrant a response, but hilariously, i’ve genuinely done that before. I got to know one of those street punk types and he slept on my couch multiple times.

          For what little i know of this internet stranger, i’d rather him stay at my place than you

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Or is it only ok if someone else pays for it?

          We’re already paying for it. It’s cheaper (financially and otherwise) to fix the problem instead.

          • redisdead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            Do you think a town’s mayor has the ability to turn junkies and other socially unfit people into actual functional human beings?

            • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You’ve taken the comic way too literally. Homelessness is a policy choice, and politicians are responsible for failing to allocate funds towards prevention, housing, etc. That applies to politicians at every level of government, with varying levels of responsibility/ability.

              Reality is more complicated than you’re viewing it.

              junkies and other socially unfit people

              You don’t seem to understand what leads a person to do drugs either.

              https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/what-does-rat-park-teach-us-about-addiction

              https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234816/

              https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-80897-8

              The financially wise decision is to house people, keep them fed, and in good health. Because when politicians let housing get fucked, when they let people starve, when they let them be ill, you get problems that get expensive in the form of prison time, police budgets, and crime rates. This is an area where doing the morally right thing is the most cost effective thing. Dehumanizing people as “junkies” and “socially unfit” just makes everything worse, for yourself included.

              • redisdead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                The financially wise decision is to house people, keep them fed, and in good health.

                Feel free to invest into housing and then practice what you preach.

                Also, I’m not dehumanizing junkies and socially unfit people. They’re definitely human. Being human however does not entitle you to free shift from people who are actually functional.

                If anything, it’s the people who say we should give them a home and food that are the ones who do the dehumanizing, treating them like pets that shouldn’t be left outside in the cold.

                • Charapaso@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  What if the road to becoming “functional” requires, at least in a plurality of cases, help from those that can afford it?

                  That “free shit” might be what helps them turn their life around. Do you think they have a better chance to improve their station in life if they don’t have access to support from the public?

                  I wholly reject that it’s somehow dehumanizing to give folks food and shelter during the worst moments in their lives.

                  • redisdead@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Feel free to feed, house and finance a homeless person.

                    You tell me how it goes.

                    Be the change you wish to see in society.

                    You talk like it’s somehow my responsibility to fix other people.

                    It’s not.

                • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Feel free to invest into housing and then practice what you preach.

                  This problem can’t be solved by personal behavior.

                  Also, I’m not dehumanizing junkies and socially unfit people. They’re definitely human. Being human however does not entitle you to free shift from people who are actually functional.

                  You are demeaning people as “junkies and socially unfit”. That’s dehumanization.

                  treating them like pets that shouldn’t be left outside in the cold.

                  They aren’t pets, nor are they being treated as such. Your jump to calling them pets further shows how you see them as less than human.

                  • redisdead@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Stop putting words in my mouth, I did say they were biologically human.

                    You’re the one looking to treat them like pets. I have 4 cats that I house, feed and take care of. Brought them from outside for 3 of them and one from a shelter. This is what you want to do to actual human beings.

                    House them, feed them, care for them. Like a pet. You’re a sick fuck.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The best they , do you know how worthwhile to save someone from mental illness ? I mean cashdollarbills, even if you don’t care about humans. Just the increase in property values from not having to look at their beat down mugs.