• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Their religion is causing danger to other drivers. If their religion is that important they can not use the roads.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah, that’s car-supremacist bullshit. There are any number of unlit things that could be in the road that automobile drivers have a responsibility to watch out for: pedestrians, cyclists, deer, etc. The notion that a driver could smash into something because they were driving too fast for the throw of their headlights and somehow not be 100% responsible for it is ridiculous blame-shifting.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        There are other things too, but as long as there are safety rules for vehicles a religious exemption is moronic. Safety is safety.

        Fuck religious-supremist exemptions from valid* public safety requirements.

        *Visibility for safety, pandemic distancing and mask requirements in public, etc. are valid. Mask bans are not valid for anyone, so there shouldn’t even be a reason for religious exemptions to come up.

      • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I hate cars, but I hate getting stuck behind the Amish even more. Doesn’t mean they need to get hit by cars, but their religion is fucked up to a degree most people don’t realize, especially when it comes to women.

        Those buggies are straight up hazardous to people, including the people driving them