• psud
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I moved from one project in my scaled agile using organisation to another and a week later got a phonecall “why are you billing half an hour a day to admin”

    “Um” says I “working out where to put how much time against each of the five rows we’re tracking our work under takes at least that long”

    Then management shot themselves in the foot

    Step 1. Instruct people that all their time must be allocated to a project task, no more admin time, no more corporate role time.

    Step 2. Assign a “tiny” piece of work to a team of 10, so the tiny work costs (10 x number of days to deliver) pdays, but was costed at a reasonable level of 20 pdays.

    Step 3. Don’t assign any other work to the team

    Step 4. Dissolve the team and scatter the staff 2 weeks later

    So by the time the team was dissolved, the work was done but for QA, which was delayed and idle because of a bug found in unit test. At that point it had cost 10 people * 10 full days — a hundred pdays.

    Management has been calling former team members asking for them to assign their time to a previous project to get the cost of the work down to its planned amount

    I don’t think it’s fraud since it’s billing this part of the organisation for work done for that part of the same, but it really makes a mockery of the idea of tracking time per project being meaningful. Anyway, I’m glad they asked me to lie on MS project in writing

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s a certain dramatic irony in the effort to account for labor activity in the business making the actual process of work significantly worse.