• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Urban probably isn’t too bad, if it’s a proper city they already have power for the infrastructure of subways, lighting, and large buildings.

    Where it’s going to be tough is putting these in the ‘burbs or the large areas of mostly vacant interstate. There’s just no infrastructure for them to build off of, and EV charging infrastructure is already one of the issues holding people back from more widely adopting them.

    • Dave.
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, just the random added load equivalent to 80-100 houses per car, any time between 5am and 9pm would be enough to send local suburban grids into a spin, especially in summer evenings when there’s peak loading already underway. A lot of infrastructure would need to be beefed up to make it reliable.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        We have an EV that charges on 110v current. It’s not fast, but plugged in the previous evening it will be ready to go by morning. Not a huge draw on the grid off household current. Obviously, just like you point out, more EV will increase demand…but charging off 110v overnight isn’t going to be as demanding as a “gas station” for EV that all want fast charge for people that maybe don’t have charging access otherwise.

        I imagine there would have to be some sort of organized system to pick charging time slots via the local electricity provider in order to keep the grid stable. EV owners could certainly get an electrical timer or via the EV manufacturer app to set a charging time.

        • Dave.
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah if you’ve got home charging it’s not a real issue. We use 240v here in Aus so you can pull quite a bit out of domestic outlets before having to get serious and generally overnight charging to top up the day’s commute would be fine.

          So it wouldn’t be a fast charger on every street, and you could always enforce limits by time of use pricing to put a dampener on peak loads.

          I just wonder if utility planners might get caught with their pants down on this one. Like, could you say 5 years ago chargers might run to 800kW?

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’d say grid planners everywhere are under serious strain. The demands for air conditioning in public and private spaces are getting higher, the number of household electronics is climbing along with data centers constantly consuming ever more amounts of electricity…now we add EV charging to the mix.

            Yeah, I’d say they haven’t been able to keep up.

    • Freefall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      lol, I am picturing buried thorium salt reactors at charging stations in the boonies.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Many rural areas honestly would not be too bad since power plants are usually out there. Those generally tend to have pretty decent power infrastructure. It might be different in other states though. Here in Washington dams and wind farms tend to be pretty far out of town.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s fine if you’re lucky enough to have a power plant nearby, but they aren’t exactly evenly scattered about for the benefit of building EV charging infrastructure.