Demsā€™ ā€œweirdā€ attacks are getting under Trumpā€™s skin. ā€œOf course heā€™s upset,ā€ a source toldĀ Rolling Stone

As Democrats continueĀ theirĀ rhetorical strategyĀ of trash-talkingĀ Donald Trump, his running mate J.D. Vance, and other ā€œweirdā€ and ā€œcreepyā€ conservative policymakers attempting to thrust the country into the dark ages, the former president has become increasingly furious at the messaging overtaking media outlets and internet memes.

During a Thursday interview with conservative radio host Clay Travis, Trump attempted to reverse the criticism and said that Democrats were ā€œthe weird ones.ā€ He insisted, ā€œNobodyā€™s ever called me weird. Iā€™m a lot of things, but weird Iā€™m not. And Iā€™m upfront. And heā€™s not either, I will tell you. J.D. is not at all. They are.ā€

ā€œWeā€™re not weird people,ā€ Trump added. ā€œWeā€™re weā€™re actually just the opposite.

  • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    Ā·
    4 months ago

    Hey. Sorry to have pissed you off so bad. Not my intention.

    Hereā€™s where I am coming from. OP posted an article. It contains a direct quote from George W Bush stating that Trumpā€™s inauguration speech was weird shit. You went and found another article stating the exact same thing as OPs and said you had no idea that Bush had said that. I was trying to indicate that the direct quote was clearly stated in the original article. You finding another source is redundant is all I was trying to say. Itā€™s a direct quote from a tweet of a former President. We donā€™t need it to be fact checked. He said it. Itā€™s real.

    Have a good one, friend.

    • DogWater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So the best version of your thesis is telling a bunch of people on a boat that arenā€™t wearing swimwear or planning on swimming that the water is good for swimming.

      To be clear, you were being a snotty shit head and didnā€™t have to say anything at all. But then you did anyway, and it was pointless. So pointless that you didnā€™t even say it clearly enough to be understood.

      Like my comment to the bush quote guy with a source is for all the people who clicked on the comments without wanting to read the rolling stone article. Your comment is for no one.

      • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yep. For all the people who came here to comment without wanting to read an article, you sure did them a solid by posting another article for them to read. Sorry to be a snotty shithead and to upset you so much. Have a good one, friend.