• ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s true that humans at all stages of life can thrive on a properly planned vegan diet, according to most major health organizations.

    Wait, including newborns? I mean, I doubt there’s a vegan alive who’s against breastfeeding, but for people who can’t breastfeed, baby formula isn’t vegan, is it?

    Not trying to rag on the point you’re making btw

    • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think there is vegan formula, and using breastmilk is vegan since it’s consensually given, including breastmilk shared by other mothers

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        using breastmilk is vegan since it’s consensually given

        the definition of veganism says nothing about consent, only exploitation. breastmilk is as vegan an cows milk.

        • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe your point would stand if humans had been bred to massively over-produce milk and had their babies taken from them so even more milk could be taken from them for profit and they had no agency in how their life went, from being bred in captivity and then impregnated in order to cause them to produce more milk to being killed when they stop producing milk.

          This is a stupid take, even for you

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            5 months ago
            1. humans are animals
            2. veganism eschews exploiting animals
            3. drinking a product from a human is exploitation

            therefore

            1. breast milk is not vegan
            • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              #3 is wrong (under normal circumstances, assuming the fluid was voluntarily given), and so obviously so that I’m going to assume you’re trolling and stop responding. Have a good one ✌️

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You’re not being exploited if you consent. Cows can’t consent, mothers can. That’s the argument.

          If we could somehow communicate w/ cows and get their consent, then cows milk could be vegan.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’re not being exploited if you consent.

            the definition of exploitation makes no mention of consent, and no clarification about consent is made in the vegan society definition.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              It’s strongly implied in the negative sense. If we want to play the definition game, here’s Merriam Webster’s definition:

              exploit (verb)
              1: to make productive use of : utilize
              exploiting your talents
              exploit your opponent’s weakness
              2: to make use of meanly or unfairly for one’s own advantage
              exploiting migrant farm workers

              Definition 2 is what I’m referring to. A baby consuming is certainly using milk for its own advantage, but the mother also benefits from the exchange. The mother cares about the health and comfort of the baby, and providing her milk can certainly be something she wants to do. Your argument only makes sense if you think children “unfairly” use the parents’ labor for their own gain as well (they consume far more than they contribute to family finances), vs parents willingly giving food and gifts to their children because they want to see them be happy and healthy.

              The point here is “meanly or unfairly,” and a mother willingly giving her milk to her baby goes exactly counter to that.

              Now, if the baby snuck into the mother’s bed and suckled without any consent or if the husband refused to purchase alternatives and essentially forced the mother to provide milk, I could see your point. But if the mother is choosing to give it, I honestly don’t see how that has anything to do with exploitation, at least in the negative sense. In the positive sense, humans absolutely exploit animals (e.g. vegans eat fruit and veggies pollinated by bees; humans are “exploiting” the bees, but the bees are also “exploiting” the flowers for pollen and nectar).

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                In the positive sense, humans absolutely exploit animals (e.g. vegans eat fruit and veggies pollinated by bees; humans are “exploiting” the bees, but the bees are also “exploiting” the flowers for pollen and nectar).

                that’s a contradiction for vegans to resolve.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Definition 2 is what I’m referring to.

                and i’m referring to definition one, and the vegan society doesn’t distinguish at all.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’re not being exploited if you consent.

            i think this is a tenet of so-called “anarcho” capitalism.