This stupid topic again

But sure

  • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No doubt; sounds like it sucks. But please don’t blame me for misogyny that they are doing.

    If you give me something to call her, equivalent to “Biden” or “Trump” or “Bernie” or things that I say about men in politics that I am talking about, I’m probably happy to start calling her that way.

    • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:@towns.gay
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      @mozz I’m not blaming you, I’m just saying that having a potential presidential nominee who is most frequently referred to by the public at large by a first name only is unusual and sets her apart from previous (male) nominees in ways which may unwittingly add to some voters’ already present feeling that perhaps she’s not really serious or experienced enough because she’s a woman.

        • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:@towns.gay
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          @mozz I would just try to mix it up a bit: Kamala Harris, VP Harris, the vice president, etc. Compare it to however you refer to male/white politicians in everyday speech and just try to balance it. If you’re calling Biden Joe or referencing a conversation between Bernie and Kamala or whatever, no problem. What really shouldn’t happen intentionally or not is unequal parallels like “the VP debate between Kamala and Vance” or “Biden and Kamala need to articulate their message better.”

          • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Tell you what

            I’ll start calling her “Harris” and see how that seems. Like I say, I think you kinda have a point that it has a subtle impact even if the way it got arrived at has nothing to do with misogyny.