• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The minute the show runners said that they did not play or care about the game before a single episode even aired, I knew it was going to suck balls.

    If you don’t know or even care about the source material: you shouldn’t have the rights to make anything about it.

    • jinkyanderson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The quote from the showrunner, according to the article:

      “We didn’t look at the game. We didn’t talk about the game. We talked about the characters and the world. So I never felt limited by it being a game.”

      Looks like they should have looked at the game a little more closely.

      • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Limited by it being a game” is such a condescending thing to say. Just shows that these people look down on video games in general and most likely have little respect for the people who these games mean a lot to. I mean, that shows in this TV show, just based on the short bits I’ve seen. The Chief acts like a Stallone or a Tom Cruise stand-in, instead of a stoic warrior.

        I can’t wait for an Elder Scrolls show helmed by these showrunners, the Witcher showrunners, and Alex Kurtzman

        • jorp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          limited by being an interactive medium where the average narrative length is dozens of hours.

          We need the unlimited story telling freedom enabled by passively watching disjoint chunks of ad-riddled content

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Tbf, I bet Todd Howard would die before letting anyone else make an Elder Scrolls show. Especially with the success of the Fallout show.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      If they didn’t name it Halo, it would have been a good sci-fi show on it’s own. But because I walked into it knowing enough about Halo lore (even though I didn’t play all that much of it). The show sucked… It wasn’t even close to living up to the game series.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 months ago

        I felt exactly the opposite, I don’t really care about halo lore that much and thought the show was horrible.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well I mean… it’s no Stargate… but Sci-fi, especially space-based Sci-fi has been kind of dead these past few years. If it wasn’t “Halo” I could give it a pass for sure.

          But with all things taste-related… to each their own.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Lost in Space was better and critics hated it. They never should have given Halo a second season.

          • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            to be completely honest i don’t remember in detail, i only watched the first season which was two years ago. Just felt like a shitty derivative made for tv movie with a big CGI budget.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They knew enough to include a first-person fight scene, because that’s what gamers wanna see.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sounds like the Doom movie, which wasn’t originally written to be a Doom movie which is very apparent by not only a few unchanged lines of dialogue but also by the fact it was more like Resident Evil than it was like Doom.

        • TheUnicornOfPerfidy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I fuckin love that film though. The Rock’s best performance. The brief moment of transphobia can fuck right off though.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t even think that was the issue, the show was just fucking awful no matter how much or little it had to do with Halo.

        • cdipierr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          For a while streamers were doing this thing where they would renew a show for Season 2 before the Season 1 pilot even released. I guess it was a way to project confidence to the audience?? Or maybe just to get the production pipeline moving so there wouldn’t be 2+ years in between season releases.

          Anyway, they did that with Halo…

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            I never thought I’d applaud the Netflix approach but it should have been used here. They should have just shut down production on season 2 when the first fell flat on its face.

  • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m so glad The Last of Us exists to show people that not all video game adaptations have to be this bad.

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fallout is proof you can make a video game show good and still be true to the original game. Halo was a completely different story they tried to throw the Halo brand on and didn’t give two shits about the game. Bungie should have sued them for slander…. or whoever owns the brand now.

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It‘s a very solid adaptation. Sure, it will always sit in the shadow of the game because that’s a masterpiece but if you haven’t played the game yet watched the show, you’re getting a well produced and complete package that isn’t offensive to the source material. Because that’s what happens if you let the writer/director of the source material actually guide you in creating the show.

        • Swarfega@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Fallout wasn’t too bad imo. A bit shit in places but they kept close to the game which certainly peases the gamers.

          • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I preferred Fallout to the last of us to be honest. The show wasn’t a 1-1 copy of any particular games but the core feeling was spot on.

        • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah hard to say because I have played the game. But I’m not particularly passionate about it. I just felt like the show was a bit meh and forgettable personally.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I never played the game, but thought the show was pretty great. Maybe not being familiar with the game is key, since you have different expectations?

  • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    4 months ago

    I couldn’t even get through the first episode. Legitimately horrible direction, shit acting, cliche story, terrible cinematography, and crap stage design. I’m surprised it lasted this long. I’m glad I didn’t need to get Paramount+ to watch it.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      The fact they couldn’t even make it as good as Red vs Blue is amazing. And that’s not a high bar.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        The mid-late seasons of rvb were pretty good. Story got fucking convoluted at the end because they had to turn the silly jokes of the early seasons into honest plot points, but overall an amazing series.

  • nevetsg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 months ago

    I cancelled it after the first episode.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    Every single character in the show is unlikeable. Maybe except Cortana, but idk if I’m biased. Been having a thing for Cortana since 9th grade.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Truly one of the worst adaptions ever made. It’s astonishing that people might have actually tried and worked hard to make this heap of garbage.

    Usually, in trash movies/TV you can see the vision at least and understand how maybe studio executives, or lack of technology, or even lack of ability destroyed the project. The kernel of what originally sold it is still there. But with Halo, I didn’t see any of that. Everything was bad. Nobody cared, and nobody tried.

  • Franklin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    A live-action Halo is a terrible idea, as is a live-action Avatar.

    Some media is so ingrained in its spectacle that to make live action work, you’d have to spend Marvel levels of money on special effects, and why? When animation is right there.

    Sure, you might be able to appeal to a larger audience, but how’s that working out for you?

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      A live-action Halo that was proud to not follow the games was a terrible idea. They did not care at all about following the source material, they did not care about wanting to make something good for Halo fans. If it had been better executed it could have done well.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I really don’t get why studios do that. They pick some well known franchise to attract the fans of that franchise, but then either figure they can do something better or that fans won’t care if they aren’t able to stick to the original story?

        And so often that “better” they go for is really just different. And there’s nothing wrong with telling a different story, just don’t try to slap the franchise name on it for the name recognition.

        Funny thing is, in some cases they could still do both by just making a new story in the same universe, either one that happens before the video game or after it (and fans would love references to events in the original story in the latter or foreshadowing events to come in the former). Though it’s still gotta be a good new story that follows the rules of the universe it’s set in.

        And to add insult to injury, after seeing the result of this over and over, people walk away thinking movies based on video games can only suck making things harder for those who would do them right.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Exactly, they hated Halo fans and wanted to make something to spite them and it turned out to make no money and they’re all out of a job.

        Just like Saints Row 4 and Volition…

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yep, these companies are so dumb, and then they go under. It’s impressive really. They just end up being out of a job and nothing to show for it.

    • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      Halo has worked live action in the past, albiet for shorter durations (Halo 3 and ODST both had really well done live action ad campaigns, plus there was Forward Unto Dawn).

      The problem is Paramount completely missed the mark in terms of tone and faithfulness to the source material, and it seems like they didn’t even try. They just went “Big green guy punches aliens, that’s what those gamerzz like, right? We can do that for a few million bucks.”

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      It wasn’t even that. If they had just gone for a grittier more realistic take it would have been fine on visuals and effects. The acting though was cringe worthy at times and the writing wasn’t any better. It just wasn’t a fun show to watch.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        And one where MasterChief doesn’t remove his helmet at every opportunity and doesn’t have sex with the first sketchy woman he meets.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The helmet thing is at odds with how our film industry works. Actors really are paid commensurate to their popularity and if your big role doesn’t have your face on it then you don’t get paid as much. So either you have to hire an A lister who doesn’t mind, (the Mandalorian did this and there was still tension), or you settle for a modified helmet or having the helmet off whenever you can rationalize it.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not that I think it should work this way, but could always just pick a lesser known actor willing to settle for a paycheck to be “David Prowse’s Darth Vader” and then dub them over with someone more famous who is paid a lesser amount of money to be “James Earl Jones’ Darth Vader”.

    • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I legit like the live action avatar. It isn’t the best thing ever, but I am actually legitimately enjoying it and it’s changes.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think a live-action Avatar could do well. I haven’t watched the Netflix show, but at least the bending in that one actually looks like they’re doing something.

  • solarvector@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wow, that’s one more season that I knew about, assumed it’d never go beyond the first.