• Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Analog is inherently lossy due to the materials and playback method. Vinyl records sound different when they are dusty.

    Digital is inherently lossless because the Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem guarantees that, given a sufficiently high sample rate, all information from the original signal is preserved.

      • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is inherently more representative of reality. Measurably so. Vinyl doesn’t and cannot have the same dynamic range as digital.

              • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                Digital files have checksums. You literally know when something has changed and you lost information. And then you have error-correction on top.

                  • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    And if your vinyl collection catches fire it also gets lost, what’s your point? That’s an argument for preservation of storage media, not for intrinsic benefits of analog.

              • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                The analog storage you are referring to from thousands of years ago has degraded substantially since its creation. Yes it’s still useful but I wouldn’t use that as evidence it’s a better medium. Case in point: texts (a digital storage form) from thousands of years ago can be retransacribed to be exact copies of the original (with respect to the knowledge contained within of course) whereas paintings from the Renaissance have changed dramatically due to aging and can never be returned to their original form since the needed data is lost.

                  • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    One example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iliad?wprov=sfla1

                    Yes, you’ll make the argument that the available versions of it are not perfect representations, though that is only because the language and dialect used to produce the work had been lost, the work otherwise remains intact.

                    Text is a digital format because you have a limited set of characters to represent sounds/syllables. For example: the meaning of the letter ‘B’ doesn’t change if a small piece of the letter is missing or if the letter is slightly tilted, it’s still a ‘B’. If the format was analog, those changes would also change the sound/meaning of the word.

            • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              True, but analog cylinders are going to be the ones people after the world burns can find and still listen. I wouldn’t count any old CDs play at that point anymore.

              Like analog degrades, digital just stops playing.