But F the poor I guess

  • drolex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not controversial, it’s just wrong. Immigration never takes jobs away, it always allows to create more jobs by inflating the local economy. Miami absorbed Cuban migrants after Mariel, and went richer. It has been widely studied now: immigrants took first low paying jobs that were understaffed, it injected more money in the local economy and it allowed spouses who were not working because they were doing the low paying jobs for free (nannying for instance) to get back to high paying jobs, it injects more money… Same in Germany with Syrian intake

    • git@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It isn’t always true tho it is true for developed countries with low birth rates. For many developing countries immigrants taking low level jobs is a negative because there isn’t enough high level jobs. And I am saying this as someone who is supportive of immigration

      • this@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the USA is in that group now. We have about 1.78 births per women in the us and that number is declining. You need a birth rate of over 2 per women in order to sustain a population without immigration. If a place does not sustain their population their economy cannot grow and if your birth rate is lower than 2 immigration is the only viable option to sustain it. Less people = less specialized jobs = less overall jobs = worse economy.

    • da_g@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t always work out man, I live it in first person, they don’t integrate don’t work because we need every last job we have and distrust public peace