• Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not for simply having, but for brandishing said bladed device as the police approached. That’s the law, in that city. As the officer said, “It is possible to find fidget toys that aren’t six-inch blades. It is possible not to walk down the street holding them out in front of you. With a bit more self-awareness, Bray could have avoided contact with us completely.” Bray brought this on himself, and could have avoided any contact with the police. He chose otherwise.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Brandish is a stretch nothing in that article noted an intent to intimidate others, it is simple possession of a tchotchke. Unless you count the author’s flavor text.

        • Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m just reading the article, as you were also able to do, and it says, “On 8 June, officers were made aware via CCTV of a man, Bray, walking down Queens Road, Nuneaton, with the sword in his hand. Bray approached officers with the blade visible, at which point he was arrested.” Bold added for emphasis. If I were out in public in the UK, and if I happened to have a bladed implement, I’d keep it out of sight. Especially if there were police anywhere nearby. But hey, you can do as you please. Have a nice day!

          • FireTower@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            The blade was inside a sheath and could be released from the sheath with the press of a button.

            And approached could simply be he was intent on walking past them on the sidewalk.