Many of the women who responded to an online callout or spoke to the Guardian expressed frustration with politics that had failed to address poverty, inequality, healthcare for women and children in particular, the climate and Brexit, and voiced acute fears for their and their families’ future: mothers of children with SEN (special educational needs) or mental health issues, mothers unable to afford childcare, or with adult children unable to buy homes, unpaid carers, women feeling exploited in low-paid jobs with no prospects of progression, and women with disabilities fearing harsher welfare conditions in future.
Scores also said they were concerned about rising extremism and political polarisation, misogyny, violence against women and girls, antisemitism and Islamophobia.
About a fifth of respondents said they had either decided to spoil their ballot paper or were considering doing so, among them Sharon, a 60-year-old social worker and “lifelong Labour voter” from London who does not own her own home and has no savings. Her two adult children are unemployed, despite having gone to university, each owing about £40,000 as a result. Private rental housing was “beyond their means”, she said.
…
Politicians, she said, had repeatedly failed to deliver on promises, such as building more houses, improving the NHS, or reducing knife crime.
“However, the final straw for me is the issue of women’s rights,” she added.
Sharon was one of hundreds of women who shared that sex-based rights for women and girls was a main political concern of theirs this election.
Women from across the country, dozens of them economically disadvantaged or with disabilities, said they would abandon Labour, the Lib Dems or the Greens over this issue and vote either Conservative, Reform or spoil their ballot – particularly women from marginal areas Labour is hoping to gain, such as Lincoln, Darlington, Derbyshire, Warrington North and Truro and Falmouth.
Various said they felt “politically homeless” because of this issue, with Starmer having repeatedly referred to the debate over trans rights as “divisive and toxic” culture wars.
If you are a former Labour voter putting a cross against the Tories or Reform (or not voting for anyone) because of trans rights, when the Tories have made all the issues mentioned worse for everyone, then you definitely have bought into the right wing press’s claim that this is a culture war.
Yes, women! Know your place! Your concerns are completely invalid!
Not all of them, just this one that the FARTs keep trying to insist is a women’s issue when it’s really only an issue for shitbags who were put on this earth to be examples of what the dunning krueger effect looks like when applied to biology.
There must be a joke somewhere about them identifying as “politically homeless” whilst encouraging transphobic ideals so far that they’ll vote Reform. Completely bizarre
Well you could link political homelessness with actual homelessness:
one in five transgender individuals have experienced homelessness at some point in their lives.
Sharon, a 60-year-old social worker … from London who does not own her own home and has no savings. Her two adult children are unemployed, despite having gone to university, each owing about £40,000 as a result. Private rental housing was “beyond their means”, she said.
Sharon was one of hundreds of women who shared that sex-based rights for women and girls was a main political concern of theirs this election.
Her finances are ruined by liberal policies but her main concern is trans people? Fuck her.
I know a couple middle aged women who are voting LibDem because they think Starmer has taken Labour too far left, because of trans people.
Fortunately they live in a Tory seat where the LibDems are the main opposition, but still, it’s disheartening as fuck
A lot of vagueness. How many is “Hundreds”? I guess under 700 or it would be “nearly a thousand”.
Then “About a fifth of respondents said they had either decided to spoil their ballot paper or were considering doing so, among them Sharon”. How do we know Sharon is reflective of the others? We don’t.
It seams like picture painted with not a lot of data, from a self selecting group, that is being cherry picked. Maybe it’s reflective, but I got no way of knowing it’s even reflective of the few hundred who wrote to The Guardian about it.
This writer got an axe to grind?
ISTG if the tories stay relevant because the fucking FARTs need to be taught their place that’ll just be the crowning fuck up to this stretch of the UK managing to screw up not letting the tories have nice things.
the fucking FARTs need to be taught their place
The hardcore trans rights activists are definitely not closet misogynists. No sir.
Nope, transphobes do as a matter of fact need punching in the face just as much as the actual goddamned Nazis they align themselves with for the sake of hating trans people for existing.
Just because a Nazi is a woman doesn’t mean she deserves to hang any less.
FARTs deserve to live in fear, because their backwards “I failed bio 101” beliefs impose that fear on innocent random folks every day.
Threatening physical violence makes it seem like you’ve lost the argument
That presumes the other side is worthy of arguing with.
We don’t reason with rabid dogs. We put them down.
You can’t claim the moral high ground while using that kind of rhetoric. It’s the kind of thing a right wing nutter would say about some given group they disagree with.
Absolutely. This is definitely not a completely unhinged take.
You see this trick you’re trying where you say actually very true things but sarcastically doesn’t actually make them less true, you just look more like a douche canoe.
When someone is unhinged as you, it’s best not to waste time engaging with any common sense.
“politically homeless” just means i’m a fucking fascist but i’m embarassed about it
Guardian hagiography for transphobes. On Saturday, exclusive interview with Nigel Farage again.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Embury, who had been living alone but continued to work with her husband after they split up years ago, took out a £250,000 loan against her home, on which she had already paid off a mortgage, in the hope of saving the family business, but in vain.
Some expressed fears for the safety of trans-identified relatives in the current political climate, such as a woman from the West Country who said her teenage daughter was transgender and felt “concerned by the aggressive and inhumane discussion of marginalised people”.
She’d “like to vote Lib Dem” but felt that the party had not centred “the harms of Brexit to our businesses, healthcare, communities and culture” sufficiently in their election campaign.
Scores of women, from across the political spectrum, said immigration was a main concern: Politicians, they told the Guardian, should “close our borders immediately”, and “tighten UK security”.
Helena, a 47-year-old teacher from Worcester who voted Labour in 2019, said parties could win her support by, among other things, “addressing immigration decisively, listening to the concerns of ordinary voters and investing in the skills of young people in this country” – views that were widely shared by respondents, various of whom expressed fears over soaring crime and poorly managed integration of migrants affecting schools and other public services.
Elizabeth, a 72-year-old retired civil servant from London, said social care, child poverty and the cultural sector were among her top concerns and she would “reluctantly” vote Labour.
The original article contains 1,328 words, the summary contains 244 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
