• ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I killed my Spotify account when they started shoveling millions of dollars at Joe Rogan, and everything they’ve done since then only confirms I made the right call.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Me too. Migrating to Tidal was extremely easy. They even imported my Spotify playlists and follows. And they are cheaper. Fuck Spotify.

      • spikespaz@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Actually it wasn’t easy, they rely on a third party service that charges the customer instead of Tidal footing that bill for you. I thought that was a bit tacky.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I may have to try that again: at the time I got too many complaints from my kids. Now Spotify hugely increased prices, probably to pay for its attempt to collect Podcasts that I’m not interested in.

      Unfortunately I agreed with my kids: other music services just don’t works as well

      • Getting6409@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Tidal has been pretty good for me over the past 5 years. I don’t know what your criteria are, but for me it’s something like 1) is the catalog big enough to offer 90% of what I’m looking for and 2) no advertising if I’m paying for the service. It ticks those boxes. I imagine it’s only a matter of time until they introduce the bullshit tier where you’re paying and being advertised to, but for now you get what you pay for.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago
          1. My teens like it

          2. I can predictably ask for either an artist or “like an artist” and get hours of what I asked for. (Apple just segued into random stuff so I always had to get it back on track. Someone I want listen to specifically someone do if I ask for that I expect to get that)

          • Getting6409@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            for that I expect to get that)

            Only thing I can say on 3 is the interface is pretty not bad. I’ve never quite liked it, but it has never really gotten in the way. I only recently started trying the track/artist mix. Also can say it’s okay. I’ve actually found a few gems over a few weeks of usage, but at the same time I have found times where it’s time to skip to the next track, though this is mostly due to personal taste and not because it’s throwing some really out of character into the playlist.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    This one is actually out of their hands. Lyrics aren’t free sadly and they have to pay for API calls. It’s fucking stupid but the labels are the ones at fault here.

    Fuck Spotify nonetheless.

    • npz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Unless there’s some agreement / licensing thing prohibiting it, and considering that lyrics don’t change, they should be able to do some caching for a total of 1 API call per song

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Surely the cost of lyrics (regardless of fetching API or royalties with caching) are miniscule compared to the other costs.

        • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I assume they are not paying for the lyrics, but for the access to the api. The lyrics are also timed to the music and the service they use might do that for them. So, like you say, serving lyrics data costs very little, but that is not what they pay for.

          And to add, I don’t really know anything about how this works behind the scenes.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        You and I can do that but they’re not just caching they’re redistributing which requires royalties

      • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not sure why you got downvoted… storing text isn’t a lot of data, they can easily do it once per song and wrap it up.

              • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                It does look that way, doesn’t it? I’m dumb as fuck. Everything I have ever touched in my life has failed or crumbled. My few friends are dying or already dead and I seem to be wrong about most things in life. I should put a bullet in my head and get off this worthless ride. Thanks for the confirmation of what an idiotic, worthless piece of shit I am and what a valueless, burdensome waste of resources I have been on this planet. May your ride yield better results than mine did.

            • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              It very much is and Spotify would definitely get sued if they weren’t paying. I got a cease and desist for an app I made about a decade ago for this very thing

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      They’re complaining that the limited, free-tier plan is worse than it used to be. And really, for no good reason.

      When EA releases Star Wars 2: A Sense Of Pride And Accomplishment, we complain about how stupid that is, do we not?

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          The 1 or 2 kB of lyrics are a few orders of magnitude smaller than the song being streamed.
          The album art probably takes up more space than the lyrics.
          So, album art should also be a paid feature?

            • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              How does it make more sense that “cosmetic” features are in the paid-tier? Would it not be the other way around?

              • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Because it improves the experience, but isn’t vital to it. If you want the free tier to be accessible to everyone, limiting things like lyrics that people like OP use as a disability accommodation isn’t the way to do it.

                • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The whole point with features being paid for is that they incentivize you to pay. There is no universal right to have a free tier or certain features for free.

                  It just makes sense to lock features that users enjoy to incentives them to pay.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    damn thats crazy, i’m out here with my 300GB collection of music that i own and control and i can just, add lyrics to shit if i want to.

    I don’t because i’m not deaf and i don’t really care for lyrics all that much, but it’s also just, automated.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      they would have a livable wage if they weren’t so fucking bad at business.

      They literally outsource the one part of the music industry that makes money publishing

      The ONLY source of revenue they have is from subscriptions, and literally all it does is pay the publishers that use spotifys platform. And also VC but that doesn’t count since it’s VC.

    • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Deafness covers a broad spectrum of hearing difficulty, not just completely deaf. Most people that identify as deaf still have some hearing. I always forget that and had the same question as you until I read a comment further down.

      It’s likely that the person isn’t fully deaf and so can still hear some music, but deaf enough that they can’t understand the lyrics. Having the ability to view the lyrics in real time is handy rather than having to search them up all the time. Spotify also shows what lyric is currently being sung in real time, whereas you can’t get that with a Google search.

  • bmeffer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve used Pandora for years. Granted, they don’t have all of the features of Spotify. But, I think their algorithm is better and my price has never changed.

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I didn’t even know they did that, Glad I don’t have an account with them. I’m partially deaf, most music I can’t understand what someone singing. Those fun things people do of like “most common misheard lyrics” is basically my life. On the plus side I enjoy music from around the world because unintelligible music is unintelligible no matter where it’s from. They’re very few artists I feel like I can understand, and realistically I’m probably wrong.

    In real life, I read lips to help augment my terrible hearing. Fun fact during the mask man dates during COVID, was probably the worst time for me. A lot of people I could hear talking as I could hear noise but I could not make out what it was. Leading to a lot of awkward conversations.

    Anyhoo, that’s all to say that for music that I do like I do have to see the lyrics. It’s what converts the noise into words.

    So, fuck you Spotify, My life’s difficult enough already, I’m not paying your shitty service so you can charge me for my impairment.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Everyone is going on about this as anti disability, but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

      Unpaid Spotify sucks, full stop, no matter what part of you works or doesn’t.

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I would say, it because the lyrics aren’t something Spotify made. No one’s picking up Spotify because only Spotify has lyrics. Spotify isn’t writing the songs. Regardless of what someone might think of Spotify or Spotify free, it’s withholding something that they have that they didn’t make from people that perhaps need it. It’d be like if broadcast TV or any on demand video service (YouTube, Disney, Netflix, etc.), said hey you didn’t pay no more closed captions for you (where a free version is applicable, of course).

        If Spotify wants to put stuff behind a paywall it can be features of the platform.

        My personal opinion is Spotify sucks, full stop. The CEO is a real piece of work. This just goes on the pile of reason Spotify sucks.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

        why would you limit the ability to use lyrics though? It’s the same shit that every big article tabloid is doing “pay us five dollar a month and we will show you our articles, that we think are good” after showing you like three, in four months for free.

        Either give people access to the service, or don’t, don’t play the bullshit of “well actually, here’s a free sample”

      • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        They’re lyrics, intentionally making the service worse for people with hearing disabilities is ableist.

  • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    goddamned y-tube told me I ran out of skips. subscribe for more skips. skips=fucks and I’m all out

  • Alchalide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ll take youtube music revanced. Installed more than a year ago, never updated since then. Logged in with Google account and still works fine.

  • Faresh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m so confused by people under this post defending a company’s scheme to make more money that disproportionately affects disabled people.

  • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I guess deaf people aren’t allowed to enjoy music like the rest of y’all.

    I’m so sorry but this is the absolute funniest shit I have ever read. 😂

    • lenz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Being deaf is a spectrum. There are plenty of people who still have some hearing, and are “hard of hearing”. There’s deaf people who can enjoy music through the use of hearing aids as well. There’s also totally deaf people who can enjoy music because of the vibrations. There’s people whose hearing is just bad enough that they don’t understand what anyone is saying without subtitles/lyrics. Deaf in only one ear, etc.