The president often had a weak, raspy voice during his first debate against Trump, in what Democrats had hoped would be a turning point in the race.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You are determined to ignore any proof I give you. You have never argued in good faith and never will. I gave you a direct quote from the DNC’s lawyer, backing up what I said, and you made up excuses for ignoring it, with the heaviest dose of gaslighting I’ve ever seen.

    The only way to satisfy you is to lie and say you’re right.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I gave you a direct quote from the DNC’s lawyer

      Dude you totally just now tried to 100% pathetically gaslight me. WTF LOL! You didn’t give me any quote at all from the DNC’s lawyer.

      The only way to satisfy you is to lie and say you’re right.

      It’s no lie whatsoever to admit your assertion that Dems could replace Biden against his will is not the slightest bit true. Everybody on TV are all saying the exact opposite. I’m supposed to believe some clueless guy on the internet over what the entire world is saying? You’re a textook case of a Dunning-Kruger person.

      Your idea that the DNC chooses the candidate is the exact Orwellian opposite of reality. Whoever gets the most delegates and becomes the candidate chooses the membership for the next 4 years.

      You have 3 gigantic misunderstandings here about the DNC.

      1. You are mistaking the DNC for a single person with monolithic views. The DNC is not a person. It does not operate as a person. It is an organization of hundreds of current members and tens of thousands of former members.

      2. You are thinking of the DNC as a single binary person in hugely simplistic terms who is either A (good) or B (evil). Even if the DNC WAS an actual person, no real person is like that.

      3. You are thinking of the DNC as a single binary person with permanent views that can never change. There is almost a complete turnover of membership every 4 years. Hundreds of new people every 4 years. Most of them have no idea what some particular former member thought 8 years ago. It’s totally irrelevant. The only thing that is relevant what the charter rules say.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Jesus Christ, this thread is ten days old and you’re responding to something three days old. Be condescending and wrong at someone else.