• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the rule of law leads terrorists to attack institutions, then we need to stop those terrorists with force. We should not bend over backwards to avoid angering the terrorists.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think you’re being too black and white. The purpose of all this society shit isn’t to have laws that are justly applied - it’s to (ideally, late stage capitalism is fucking is here) provide the best life we can to as many people as we can. Being murdered, robbed or a bundle of other things fucking sucks so we use the law to guarantee (again, suckinh at this right now) safety and stability.

      If someone did a little asshattery I don’t want to start a civil war - as a parallel, if someone runs a red light and we could either let them go unpunished or start a high speed chase, I’m going to favor the former. There is a line somewhere, there is some amount of petty treason someone could commit and some quantity of armed fanatics backing them where I’d say “we should just not risk it.”

      Basically, sometimes it’s optimal to be non-confrontational even if it feels shitty.

      • AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        “Give us everything we want or we will stage an armed uprising, also we really really want to do an armed uprising and have been openly saying so for years”

        Doesn’t seem like a group worth placating

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah, fuck that noise. I don’t want to start a civil war, either, but I’ll be more than happy to end one. You’re conceding ground to effective terrorism.