• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    6 months ago

    Counterpoint: you can have high-quality human contact with people you choose to be around, not so much with people you’re paid to be around.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Even if I did choose the company I applied to for work, I didn’t choose my coworkers, nor did I get to meet them until after I was hired. And, I certainly don’t get to choose the customers I have to interact with during my work.

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Considering that my desired workplace is “laying in bed for $5k a week”, no I can’t say that I did. Survival and a safe place to shit dictated that.

        • Kayel
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          You’d get bored and want to be productive.

          It’s just hard to be motivated when burnt out by a company that hates it needs you and forces people to do work in a stupid way without autonomy and the goal of fucking their customers

          Edit: I’m referring to post-capitalism, not justifying corporate bullshit

          Edit: I have no idea what’s going on. Clearly someone doing nothing would do things not to be bored.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’d get bored and want to be productive.

            I can whole heartedly confirm that not everyone needs to have a job to not be bored. My ADHD ass has a whole ton of possible things I can learn the absolute basics too without being productive and moving onto the next shiny thing but work keeps getting in the way.

            • Kayel
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              See, I would classify learning for learning’s sake to be productive.

              And, yes, that’s exactly what I was trying to say

              • snooggums@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                6 months ago

                Learning by itself isn’t being productive because it doesn’t produce anything. Doing things with that knowledge would be productive.

                Keep in mind the context of this thread is work, which gives a context to being ‘productive’ that is wasting time making someone else money to get a pittance.

                • Kayel
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I separate work under capitalism from community directed, individually motivated, anarchially organised work. Hence the first edit.

                  Learning is a requirement of productivity, productivity cannot exist without learning, therefore learning is productive.

                  I don’t think people have an issue with work, they have an issue with the current state.