• joaomarrom [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So… following that same logic, they are all socialists, then? A lib or chud’s (tomato tomahto) worldview is such a spaghettified mess of contradictions that trying to understand their thought process is a legit cognitohazard.

    Socialism is bad and inhumane because it shoots the homeless. I, Chud McLibson, would like homeless people to be shot. Therefore, socialism serves my interest so it’s good. But it’s socialism, so it’s bad. But good? Enough thinking, head hurts, time to post.

    • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Socialism is bad because they shoot homeless people and drink their blood.

      Socialism is also bad because socialists builds commie blocks for everyone to live in which is giving people free stuff which is theft from those who actually work and teaches people to be lazy.

      And those commie blocks? They’re bad because they’re not McMansions which proves that socialism is bad because they want everyone to be poor. Also, those commie block are built so poorly that they start to fall apart after 30 years of deferred maintenance following the restoration of capitalism.

      Also, in 1978 some guy in Petropavlovsk stubbed his toe and that’s why communism has failed and will never work.