It’s actually not a bug, but obvious behavior.

  • Dave.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The bug is the lack of documentation and that a simple unguarded command can erase all user’s data on the system.

    Also, the principle of least surprise would like a word.

    If I look at the command line arguments of a program called “systemd-tmpfiles” and one of them is called “purge” I will generally assume that option will purge temporary files.

    Now it turns out that someone decided that this program would be a simple way to do something with /home directories(*) so they included /home in the config file for the program, the file that the program reads by default when it is invoked.

    Who decided it would be a good idea for it to deal with /home?

    Wellllll…

    https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/tmpfiles.d/home.conf

    (*)I have no idea what this program is doing with /home in its config file. I will presume that there is a useful and mostly logical reason for it, and that this command line option was just an unfortunate footgun for those users who were not intimately familiar with systemd.

    • NekkoDroid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There were talks a few years ago about changing sd-tmpfiles name but it was decide not worth it due to the churn and bikeshedding it would cause.

      sd-tmpfiles is generally used to create, modify (e.g. permissions) and remove directories on the system. The home.conf is intended for systems that only ship /usr/ (e.g. containers) to create /home/ and /srv/ as a separate subvolume on btrfs

    • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I will presume that there is a useful and mostly logical reason for it

      Home directories are temporary, obviously