• MartianRecon@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s up for debate. For me, he’s the most liberal since Kennedy but if you think it’s LBJ instead, that’s fine too!

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh, he’s certainly the most liberal since Kennedy. But he’s not progressive except in the slogans of centrists.

      • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think that’s a no true Scotsman kind of thing. Biden has done plenty of progressive policies. He’s forgiven billions in student loan debt (and wanted to forgive more but R courts are political), he’s passed infrastructure, and he’s also passed some bills to keep the cost of medicine down.

        Could he do more? Sure. If voters showed up at the midterms and gave him a D house, he could have done more. But they didn’t.

        Way too often, people let perfect be the enemy of good. Biden is good, not perfect.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sure. If voters showed up at the midterms and gave him a D house, he could have done more. But they didn’t.

          If Democrats had used the majorities we gave them during his first two years instead of getting in their own way, this would be a convincing argument.

          • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            They did use them as best they could. They were hamstrung by a filibustering Senate, and two conservative Democrat senators (Sinema and Manchin) who refused to support getting rid of it, making killing the proposition of killing the filibuster DOA. As a result, their only choice to pass legislation was budget reconciliation, which aren’t subject to filibuster. The issue is that reconciliation has several big limits:

            1. The bill has to be related to government spending, revenue, and the debt ceiling. You can’t toss in things like minimum wage increases or voting rights legislation.

            2. You can only pass one of these bills per year (theoretically you can do more, but additional reconciliation bills have to go through the budgrt committee and with a 50/50 senate the GOP can just skip those meetings to deny quorum and keep it stuck)

            3. Whatever passes still has to get at least 50 votes, which means either appeasing Manchin/Sinema or getting Republican votes (which ain’t gonna happen)

            And despite that, we still got the CHIPS act, an infrastructure bill, and the Inflation Reduction Act, which–even with Manchinema throwing as many grenades in the process as they could get away with–was the biggest climate change bill in our country’s history. Not perfect, no, but a sizable step in the right direction, for once.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              6 months ago

              They were hamstrung by a filibustering Senate, and two conservative Democrat senators

              That’s what I mean by getting in their own way.

          • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Biden had numerous accomplishments from his first 2 years, lol.

            That’s completely disingenuous.