Again, that doesn’t show up in the article. I can see you want it to say that, but I’m sorry, the article is objectively not suggesting no consequences.
No, you’re trying to conflate their disagreement with this action with the idea that they disagree with any action, which you’ve thus far been unable to support with quotes from the article.
You’re claiming the author’s opinion using the article, which is trash (according to you), so you can’t use the article to support your claim. So your claim is unsupported, even though you say the article supports your claim?
Removed by mod
Again, that doesn’t show up in the article. I can see you want it to say that, but I’m sorry, the article is objectively not suggesting no consequences.
Removed by mod
No, you’re trying to conflate their disagreement with this action with the idea that they disagree with any action, which you’ve thus far been unable to support with quotes from the article.
Removed by mod
GG no re?
Removed by mod
You’re claiming the author’s opinion using the article, which is trash (according to you), so you can’t use the article to support your claim. So your claim is unsupported, even though you say the article supports your claim?
Yea, no re.
Removed by mod