fukhueson@lemmy.world to World Politics@lemmy.world · 5 months agoOne Step Forward for the ICC, One Leap Backward for Peacewww.lawfaremedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down14
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkOne Step Forward for the ICC, One Leap Backward for Peacewww.lawfaremedia.orgfukhueson@lemmy.world to World Politics@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-25 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-25 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarefukhueson@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-25 months agoYou’re claiming the author’s opinion using the article, which is trash (according to you), so you can’t use the article to support your claim. So your claim is unsupported, even though you say the article supports your claim? Yea, no re.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-25 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarefukhueson@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoWhile that reasoning is impenetrable, I am gonna have to stand firm in my opinion :)
Removed by mod
GG no re?
Removed by mod
You’re claiming the author’s opinion using the article, which is trash (according to you), so you can’t use the article to support your claim. So your claim is unsupported, even though you say the article supports your claim?
Yea, no re.
Removed by mod
While that reasoning is impenetrable, I am gonna have to stand firm in my opinion :)