• fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I can’t even begin to make any sort of judgement on that, there are multitudes of mechanisms at their disposal I’m surely unaware of that could be employed. Netanyahu may be suffering his own consequences at home without help from the outside, creating a setting for the ICC in the near future to come after him in a different way with fewer potential pitfalls, though again I can’t say what should be done. I can see the author’s point in how this action could potentially not lead to peace right now, and agree.

      • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Can you show me in that quote where it says there should be no consequences? Not that it will push people to the right.

          • fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The ICC’s current action is considered by the author to potentially not lead to peace but inflame aspects of the conflict.

            The move might be one small step forward for some sort of symbolic justice, but it’s going to be a giant leap backward from reaching a far more important goal—peace.

            Can you summarize the article, with quotes directly supporting your claims, in the way you see it?