• barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    Jill Stein is not going to be president. Your assertion is in bad faith or ignorance.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        No, she won’t. And hopefully I voted for viable candidates down the sheet because I’ll have lost that vote.

        She’ll be president if enough voters to overwhelm the EC’s red shift vote for her. Which will not happen with FPTP. There are 46 examples of this not happening over a couple hundred of years. Including her, specifically, in 2012 and 2016.

    • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      you literally accused people who said they want Jill Stein to win of lying and actually wanting another candidate to win. that’s bad faith.

        • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          no, they are saying they don’t want any of that and voting against Republicans and Democrats at the same time.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            No, they don’t care who wins because they are privileged and think it won’t affect them. No third party has ever come close to winning in the history of the country. It will not happen. So they are expressing that they’re okay if it gets worse.

            • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 days ago

              No, they don’t care who wins because they are privileged and think it won’t affect them.

              another bad faith statement. you need to ask them what they want, and believe their answer, or dialogue cannot progress.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                24 days ago

                Your (and their) arguments may not be in bad faith, but they are in conflict with objective reality.

                They either believe Jill Stein will actually win, which is false based on all of US history, including the elections she already participated in.

                Or they believe there is literally no difference for, say, women, when 1/3 of SCOTUS are religious extremists appointed by an insurrectionist. Or on climate. Or Ukraine. Or voting rights. Etc. The question “is a president allowed to break the law and do whatever” is somehow still open. Is that not completely insane?

                I understand what they claim they are doing with the protest vote. But in actuality, they have looked at the difference and decided that it isn’t much. That can only come from a position of privilege or extreme ignorance.

                • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  They either believe Jill Stein will actually win … Or… they have looked at the difference and decided that it isn’t much

                  this is still putting words in their mouths. it’s not good-faith engagement.

                  • barsquid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    24 days ago

                    No, that’s reality.

                    The other case I also pointed out is they might be unaware of the facts. You are engaging in bad faith by misrepresenting my words to form a what you think is a strawman to argue against.