Unpaywalled archive link: https://archive.ph/TDGsk Open Access link to the study mentioned: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/puh2.27

Posting because I saw another post on this community about Extinction Rebellion UK blocking a private jet airport today (June 2024) (https://extinctionrebellion.uk/2024/06/02/climate-activists-blockade-farnborough-private-jet-airports-three-main-gates/) and wondered how many people know that leaded fuel is still pretty common in planes, both in the UK and elsewhere; I was pretty shocked when I first learned this

  • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Leaded fuel is still used in piston airplanes everywhere. While there are ongoing efforts to develop an unleaded alternative, there is none currently available to the market.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There are already multiple unleaded aviation fuels in testing, and one (G100UL) commercially available. The main barrier is that the engines, especially larger and older ones, are not designed to run on unleaded fuel, and must be certified.

      • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right, hopefully G100UL can replace 100LL reasonably quickly, but there’s a big difference between “commercially available” and actually available. I imagine it will be quite some time until it’s commonplace for GA aircraft, unfortunately.

        • ephemeral_gibbon
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          If they aren’t absolutely essential for some important societal function the aircraft should just be grounded rather than be allowed to fly on leaded. No one’s toy or joy ride should be giving thousands of people lead poisoning

    • br3d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not even business - a lot of small planes are just hobbyists. So we’re getting poisoned (to say nothing of the noise pollution) by people flying in circles for fun

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        finally someone who gets it.

        I wonder if we’ll ever come to a time when we can get the vroom vroom crowd to put down their poisoning toys, something tells me our species is fucked because they’re never going to stop.

        we have an air show here in Seattle every summer where the navy burns tens of thousands of gallons to VROOM f-18s around the lake.

        I’m prior service, I’m not anti-military extremist, but do we really need to dump tens of thousands of gallons of gas into the summer (already shitty) air quality and the CO2 it becomes after combustion? for ‘patriotism’?

        Logically, no, but god forbid you take away the circuses from people, even if it’s hurting their communities.

        • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Roughly a quarter of General Aviation traffic (which is primarily piston single-engine aircraft) is flight training, 30% is personal use, and the other 45% is commerce. I’m hoping we can increase adoption of unleaded alternatives since I don’t see most of those flights going away.