• Ibaudia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Protesting police brutality respectfully and nonverbally

    Telling young women that they will only be truly happy if they are homemakers during their commencement ceremony and that anything else is “diabolical lies” meant to have you stray from god’s path

    How are these in any way equivalent

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      They aren’t equivalent. And to conservatives, the second one is to be praised and the first one is to be damned.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Kicker for the US football team Chiefs based in Kansas City gave a commencement speech where he laid out a bunch of misogynistic and homophobic bullshit including the equivalent of “women belong in the kitchen” and is getting defended by conservatives as speaking to family values or whatever they call that bullshit now.

      Sounds like you know about the guy on the right already, but for anyone else that might not know he was simply kneeling to bring attention to racism and was vilified by those same conservatives.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          While race certainly played a part with the reaction to Kaepernick, that doesn’t mean this guy got a free pass for being white. Conservatives would have defended someone of any race who spouted misogynist word vomit.

            • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              They defend him because they like the idea of shooting liberal protesters in the street. “Murderer” is not a mark of shame to them.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I do love how they defend him in part by saying he killed a convicted sex offender as if he could have possibly known that and as if that were his (or anyone’s) job to do.

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Is Colin Kaepernick black in America? I can see he wears his hair long now but in the UK you’d just say he looks vaguely mixed race. Very Caucasian features actually, kind of looks French-Algerian.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                You don’t understand:
                A white woman can have a black baby.
                A black woman cannot have a white baby.

                This is very normal and makes perfect sense. Stop looking at it closely.

              • Duranie@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                There’s the “One Drop rule.” (Wikipedia)

                "The one-drop rule was a legal principle of racial classification that was prominent in the 20th-century United States. It asserted that any person with even one ancestor of black ancestry (“one drop” of “black blood”)[1][2] is considered black (Negro or colored in historical terms). It is an example of hypodescent, the automatic assignment of children of a mixed union between different socioeconomic or ethnic groups to the group with the lower status, regardless of proportion of ancestry in different groups.[3]

                This concept became codified into the law of some U.S. states in the early 20th century.[4] It was associated with the principle of “invisible blackness”[5] that developed after the long history of racial interaction in the South, which had included the hardening of slavery as a racial caste system and later segregation. Before the rule was outlawed by the Supreme Court in the Loving v. Virginia decision of 1967, it was used to prevent interracial marriages and in general to deny rights and equal opportunities and uphold white supremacy."

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It asserted that any person with even one ancestor of black ancestry

                  I think that means technically everyone is Black.