• snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      While race certainly played a part with the reaction to Kaepernick, that doesn’t mean this guy got a free pass for being white. Conservatives would have defended someone of any race who spouted misogynist word vomit.

        • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          They defend him because they like the idea of shooting liberal protesters in the street. “Murderer” is not a mark of shame to them.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I do love how they defend him in part by saying he killed a convicted sex offender as if he could have possibly known that and as if that were his (or anyone’s) job to do.

    • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Is Colin Kaepernick black in America? I can see he wears his hair long now but in the UK you’d just say he looks vaguely mixed race. Very Caucasian features actually, kind of looks French-Algerian.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You don’t understand:
            A white woman can have a black baby.
            A black woman cannot have a white baby.

            This is very normal and makes perfect sense. Stop looking at it closely.

          • Duranie@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            There’s the “One Drop rule.” (Wikipedia)

            "The one-drop rule was a legal principle of racial classification that was prominent in the 20th-century United States. It asserted that any person with even one ancestor of black ancestry (“one drop” of “black blood”)[1][2] is considered black (Negro or colored in historical terms). It is an example of hypodescent, the automatic assignment of children of a mixed union between different socioeconomic or ethnic groups to the group with the lower status, regardless of proportion of ancestry in different groups.[3]

            This concept became codified into the law of some U.S. states in the early 20th century.[4] It was associated with the principle of “invisible blackness”[5] that developed after the long history of racial interaction in the South, which had included the hardening of slavery as a racial caste system and later segregation. Before the rule was outlawed by the Supreme Court in the Loving v. Virginia decision of 1967, it was used to prevent interracial marriages and in general to deny rights and equal opportunities and uphold white supremacy."

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              It asserted that any person with even one ancestor of black ancestry

              I think that means technically everyone is Black.