• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Your original statement is not supported.

    I’m legitimately trying to help here…

    But you need to tell me what you’re actually asking for.

    Do you need Hillary explicitly saying she wanted the INR (the intelligence agency she controlled when making the statement) because if she meant something like the CIA then somehow her comments aren’t a big deal?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        that

        Why can’t you just say what you mean?

        She said:

        And if we were going to push for an election, then we should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win.

        She literally said “we” should have rigged the election…

        While in a discussion about the actions of the State department…

        That’s what rigging an election means, determining who would win it rather than letting the votes determine it.

        The only way I can possibly think you have a valid compliant, is if you’re saying that her “we” meant American intelligence agencies in general (no idea how that makes a difference) and not “we” as the head of the state department meaning the state department and their own intelligence agency…

        And if your argument is that pedantic, it makes sense why you won’t just say it, but not why you keep replying.