Trump has waffled on whether the Israel-Gaza war should end. But speaking to wealthy donors behind closed doors, he said that he supports Israel’s right to continue “its war on terror.”

Former president Donald Trump promised to crush pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses, telling a roomful of donors — a group that he joked included “98 percent of my Jewish friends” — that he would expel student demonstrators from the United States, according to participants in the roundtable event with him in New York.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    But let’s protest Biden by abstaining in the general! That’ll teach the Dems a lesson! And get a shit ton more Palestinians murdered but I’ll teach the Dems a lesson that they will definitely forget by 2028!

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      We really need to drive this point home.

      Oh, you’re not voting for Biden because of his support for Israel? Tell me more about how you care more about teaching dems a lesson than you care about minimizing the Palestinian death toll.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Even if they had the same stance on Israel, which they clearly don’t, let’s not forget the Ukrainians that would lose support on day one of a Trump presidency. Also, China would likely begin to move on Taiwan without US support. He’d set the stage for WWIII and justify it as isolationism.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Agree on Ukraine, but China doesn’t have the capability to make a move on Taiwan and won’t for another decade, if ever. Though Hong Kong and the Uighurs would have an even worse time with Trump in the Whitehouse to be sure.

          China’s capability of invading Taiwan has been overstated in the media. Sure they have a massive army, but Taiwan is an island and amphibious operations are very very hard to pull off. That being said, Trump probably wouldn’t be sending a lot of arms to Taiwan so China invading Taiwan in a decade would be more likely.

          • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            but Taiwan is an island and amphibious operations are very very hard to pull off.

            That might hurt them more than anything. All china has to do is blockade Taiwan, obliterate any fishing vessels and ports it sees, and bomb farmland.

            A castle can only be defended for as long as it has food stores.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              China can’t blockade Taiwan while being outside the range of missiles and drones. China probably has about 400 ships but what is the quality of the air defense and drone boat defense do they have?

              They don’t have the space to do what Russia is trying (unsuccessfully) in the Black Sea with keeping their ships outside the range of missiles and drones.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            That’s a fair assessment of invasion threat. However, if we pull out of the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, they’ll be forced to accept China’s control of import again. That’s devastating to an island nation’s economy.

      • aaa999@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Having interacted with these people I can tell you that nothing has any effect on these goalpost moving liars and you just have to step on their dicks and convince bystanders like you do with any worthless bullshitter

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The protest vote did send a pretty strong message to dems, but they evidently didn’t give a fuck so now we just have to suck it up and vote for biden. It’s not that they’ll forget the lesson, it’s that they never learned it at all. 2016 should have been a lesson as well but we see how that turned out.

      • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        This part really kills me. We already watched it happen once and are now dealing with irreparable damages as a result. How many people protested HRC by either abstaining or voting for a third-party? Fucking nobody wants Hillary in office anymore, but we don’t get a say in the ticket so you suck it up and vote for the person who isn’t saying they will literally commit all the crimes because being president absolves them of any blame.

    • slurpyslop@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      the democrat party will lose if a segment of their voter base abstains from voting

      and

      the democrat platform can afford to completely ignore a segment of their voter base so doesn’t need to adjust their platform

      are two mutually exclusive positions

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Wrong. What the democratic party does is nearly irrelevant.

        “We will not vote for Biden because of Gaza” and “We will do what’s best for the Palestinians who live in Gaza” are, unfortunately, truly mutually exclusive positions.

        It’s extremely sad, but that’s the position your Republican neighbors have put you in.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Voting for someone is giving them a stamp of approval either explicitly or implictly. Democrats need to lose. They need to be afraid of losing votes. If they can act in this manner and still win, they are learning the wrong lesson. The quiet part that Trump said out loud - that he can shoot someone on 5th Ave and people would still vote for him.

          I’m tired of this end of the world argument for voting Biden. If our institutions are so fragile that this election topples our democracy for good - then sorry to burst your bubble but the democracy is already a goner.

          Israel is committing the worst ethnic cleansing campaign of our generation. I cannot and will not vote for someone embracing them and helping them get away with it. We cannot let fear cloud our principles.

          • dudinax@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Giving up your right to vote isn’t going to teach Democrats anything about needing your vote.

            Let me get your position straight: you can’t do anything about democracy in the U.S., but you can do something about ethnic cleansing in Gaza.

            You either don’t live in the US or are incoherent.

            • kava@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I think you’re wrong. I think if Democrats lose this election they will do their analysis and focus groups and surveys and if it points to the decisive issue being Gaza then they will change their attitude on Gaza - even if marginally, they will be forced to.

              As for me, I just got my right to vote 2 years ago and I’ve been living here 25 years. I’m going to vote. I’m just not voting for Biden or Trump. I’ll write uncommitted or blank or something.

              This is what democracy should be. Candidates lose votes if they don’t act in a manner congruent with the beliefs of the base. This “vote no matter what because the alternative is worse” is not democracy. If you don’t have a choice, you don’t have a vote. You’re headed same direction either way.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 months ago

                You can think that we are wrong all you want. But we can point to evidence that you’re wrong. It didn’t happen in 1980. It didn’t happen in 2000. It didn’t happen in 2016. And it didn’t happen any number of times before that.

                Literally the only time in at least the last 50 years. The Democrats actually listened and changed their behavior. Was when they were primaried by someone much more Progressive and committed. They saw the turn out for Sanders and changed because of it. They’ve never changed for non-turnout. Or to court the voters of third-party candidates that struggle to even break single digits.

                Civil rights wasn’t passed because of non-voting or even protests. It was passed because of a desire to win the near guaranteed votes of that group. If they weren’t, neither a group would have passed it yet.

                Teaching them requires strong candidates to primary them with and pull them to listen to you. Blame democrats for not primary themselves all you want it’s just kind of foolish. You and we as a whole we need to start preparing now to primary candidates at every level of government in all upcoming elections. That’s how they listen.

                • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  They should have had a primary in 2024 if their only candidate was a genocide supporter. If Democrats lose because of this, because they didn’t, I’ll be so pissed.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                You’re not wrong. That is how the American electoral system should work. But Trump and Project 2025 would fundamentally break the American experimental democracy. There may not be a viable means to elect a Democratic or another party in 2028.

                Project 2025 aims to roll back civil rights and destroy the federal government, among other proposals source

                See, you can advocate for Biden without defending a genocide. It can be done ✅

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You certainly can.

                  Biden rejoined the Paris Climate Agreement, revoked the Keystone Pipeline permit, created a 13 million acre federal petroleum reserve for Alaskan wildlife, greatly increased oil site lease cost, signed $7B in solar subsidies, enacted the Inflation Reduction act to support clean energy, created the CHIPS Act to improve reliance on domestic technology, reenacted Net Neutrality, repealed Title 42, ended the Muslim Ban, reinstated the sanctions on Israeli settlement on Palestinian territory, signed the Equality Act for LGBTQ+ rights, restored gay rights to beneficiaries, reenacted trans care anti-discrimination law, signed the Respect for Marriage Act, enabled unspecified gender on US Passports, rejoined WHO, rescheduled marijuana, reducing drug costs with the American Rescue Plan Act…

                  Trump repealed 112 climate regulations, left the Paris Climate Agreement, disbanded the pandemic response team stalling national pandemic response, left the WHO, repealed trans care anti-discrimination law, repealed gay rights to beneficiaries, enacted Title 42 and the Muslim ban, repealed sanctions on Israeli settlements on Palestinian territory, repealed Net Neutrality, provided tax cuts to the wealthy that further widened our already exploitative wealth inequality, increased tariffs on goods costing the consumers, repealed the ACA without replacement, seated the conservatives in SCOTUS that repealed Roe v. Wade…

                  It’s not a contest if you’ve been paying attention.

                • Xerø@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  That’s a fascist’s wishlist, it’s a bunch of stuff that’s never going to happen, but it’s a useful cudgel for some people to bludgeon dissenters with.

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Think about it this way:

            Do you want to move the Overton window? I presume yes (and to the left). You accomplish that by giving Dems consistent and overwhelming victories. When the Dems win consistently, then they can move left. When they lose they will go to the center. When they go against an incumbent R they will run a center candidate, that’s how we got Bill Clinton and Biden. Want them to move left? Vote and give them consistent and overwhelming victories.

            • Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              And I know this isn’t remotely possible given how entrenched red states are, but if the Dems got a super majority, I fully expect we’d get ranked choice voting, and for the Dem party to split. Progressives and moderates don’t particularly want to be in the same party, but it is a necessity until the racist fascist right (and their judges, etc) can be removed. And that requires a super majority.

              I seriously had a glimmer of hope that this would be the course correction after Jan 6th, but I quickly discovered how foolish I was to think the Right, and their voters, actually have a line to cross.

              Edit - that was an autocorrect error, but still rather accurate…

          • Belastend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Re: Committing the worst ethnic cleansing campaign:

            • During the Congolese Civil War, between October 2002 and Jan 2003 Congolese forces killed 40% of the Pygmy Population of Congo. Thats 70.000 people. I’d argue thats worse.

            • The Darfur Genocide is still ongoing and has killed 300.000 People.

            • The Rohingya Genocide killed 20.000 and led 1 million people to flee their homeland, that was in 2017.

            • The Yazidi Genocide displaced 71% of the global Yazidi population and killed 5.000, out of a population of 700.000. This ended only in 2016.

            • There are currently 19 million people suffering from starvation in Yemen, due to a war perpetrated by Saudi- and Iran-backed forces.

            • The Amhara are suffering a genocide for the last 30 years, which has resulted in 2 Million People being absent from any record. During the recent Ethiopean War another 2 million Amhara fled their homeland while being raped, enslaved and killed.

            Noone in this thread would deny the Palestinian Genocide, but to claim its the worst one in a whole generation is to ignore at least 3 or 4 genocides on this list.

          • jumjummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            You are either a Russian disinformation agent, or a completely naive, and foolish person. Surprising how you think the Palestinians dying in Gaza is the “worst ethnic cleansing campaign of our generation”. Take a look at some countries in Africa (Sudan and Darfur region specifically) if you want to see some truly atrocious numbers.

            • kava@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              Tell me where in Sudan you had some of the most densely populated urbanized places in the world carpet bombed and 2 million people tossed around and ping ponged around from evacuation to evacuation - all committed by a supposed democratic advanced country? Even worse- a key ally of the US? Nation who cares about human rights, egalitarianism, etc?

              Darfur genocide happened 20 years ago over the course of years. Gaza we haven’t even seen a year yet. You want to argue semantics about what generation means? You want to compare and contrast? Did you see the US president get on TV and hug a warlord with tears in his eyes as F16s dropped MK84 bombs onto women and children like Biden did with his precious Bibi?

              Let’s see. Maybe you are the disinformation agent. Trying to muddy the waters. Make it seem a little less bad. Very easy to say to discredit, yeah? You are a bot. Part of pro-Israel hasbara campaign. You’re a shill, a dope, a duntz

              Look I did it too. I’m so tired of this nonsense online. This all started around 2016.

              • jumjummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                So after all that text, what is your suggestion come November? Pontificate all you want, but short of voting for Biden, you are supporting, either directly or indirectly, a Trump presidency, and if that becomes the case the situation is Gaza will only become worse.

                So you are nothing but a naive fool with no actual solutions or suggestions, just fairy tale “I wish this isn’t how reality works”

                • Xerø@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Nothing naive about it “your vote, your choice” is still valid even today. You may not like the fact that progressives and independents don’t toe the party line but you need to learn to accept differing viewpoints. No one attacked you, they just stated their opinions and you immediately went on the offensive.

      • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Only if you ignore that there’s also a segment of Democratic voters who would reconsider support for Biden if he took a stance that they perceived as anti-Israel. Democrats are a coalition party of compromises between factions who have to work together to find as much common ground as possible in order to have any political relevance in a first-past-the-post system. Biden has to walk whatever tightrope loses the fewest votes, and he seems to think that not doing a 180 on decades of US foreign policy is the best way to do that.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Where are my “genocide Joe” boys? You, the ones that have nothing to say but Biden/democrats bad?

    You always leave this part out. Troll farm tankies.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      The fact that no matter who I vote for it’s gonna end up with kids being killed on my dime is the problem. At least Biden will pretend to feel bad about it, which is all I’ve come to expect from my government.

      I’ve long given up on the notion that I get to vote for someone I like in this system.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I wish that “likability” wasn’t such a huge part of the equation. Doing the right thing and being effective at it should be a bigger factor.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          By “likability” I mean that I agree with some or most of the things they consider the right thing. I want to be enthusiastic about them instead of just mainly hoping they don’t do too much damage.

          Cue someone posting a billion links about Biden in response because that’s gonna convince me.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve long given up on the notion that I get to vote for someone I like in this system

        Democracy baby! :/

        I think this is the practical assessment of politics for a mature adult however. We want better, but we understand that we won’t get our ideal, perfect options. We have to choose for the better, unideal, option, and hope that our choices will allow our progeny to one day have those ideal candidates.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Excuse me, but I never leave out that Trump is a fascist who’s worse than Biden. And I’ll vote Biden against Trump. Biden is still a lying piece of shit absorbing and spreading Israeli propaganda about murdered babies and systematic rape on Oct 7. He’s still facilitating a genocide. None of Trump’s evil words can change that. Biden can change that, but he chooses not to.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe you should understand that there are biggwr pictures?

        The sucky part of being a politician is that inevitably you’ll have to make decisions that you won’t like, that go against your better judgement, that you might be opposed to. There simply may be bigger issues at stake. You may have an ally that you begrudgingly have to support because if you don’t you can lose that ally, making the situation so much worse. Worse yet, you might upset a large part of your voters that will in turn not vote for you on the next election.

        I dunno for sure but I think that Biden is in the situation where he must be very careful with what he does with Israel. You may not have noticed, but he has been criticizing them, he has been pushing them to stop, but very very carefully.

        In a way He’s may be in the same situation as us. Just as we begrudgingly have to vote Biden over trump to avoid shit really going to hell, he may have to begrudgingly support Israel to avoid losing many voters that he’ll need in the next elections.

        Because of this I think it isn’t as simple as “Biden is a liar” and “Biden supports genocide”. I could be wrong and he very well may be evil, but from what I’ve seen, from what he’s been doing in other parts of his job, I highly doubt that. I really do believe that he’s trying to navigate this situation as carefully sd he can.

        Shit simply isn’t that simple

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Oh I know exactly where you can find them! Just visit lemmy.world/c/politicalmemes community, they post there 24/7

    • Krono@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m right here, this article does nothing to change my mind about how Joe Biden is aiding and abetting an ongoing genocide.

      Yes, Trump will almost certainly be worse. That doesn’t change the fact that our current president’s support for genocide is deplorable, it hurts his electoral chances, and it damages the US standing in the world.

      Burying Palestinian families alive under the rubble of their former homes is not a good use of my tax dollars. Joe Biden needs to stop.

      • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Genocide is a US problem not specific to any president.

        You can say “Joe Biden is helping/supporting Israel in its genocide on Palestinians”. Calling him “genocide joe” is repeating GOP bs. They say it like that to keep the critical thinking to a minimum.

        • Krono@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes we agree that other modern presidents have been genocidal as well.

          Using that fact as an excuse for the current genocide is not some realpolitik, “adults in the room” level of thinking. It is moral depravity and the banality of evil.

          • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Who is using it as excuse for the current genocide? Where does it say “genocide is ok”? “Adult in the room” my ass.

            When comparing 2 candidates, genocide doesn’t matter because they will both do it, you substract that from both side of the equation in US politics. Once a president is in office then you can protest decision, this is about comparing candidates.

            Using the GOP propaganda of “genocide joe” like it’s his personal hobby just feeds the trolls. The article is about Trump, and the guy at the top of this thread is asking where the “genocide joe” trumpers are given Trump admits the same. Anyone answering “i’m here”, but saying “AKshUaLlY i’m not a trumper but biden is commiting genocide” is just pedantic and missing the point of this discussion

            • cmbabul@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s always one of the folks from one of the newer instances/communities I see making these arguments, usually it’s sh.itjust.works or kbin but I saw quite a few from .today this weekend. Seems like the older instances that were either up or started because of the migration from reddit are less filled with trolls and bad faith in my experience

            • Krono@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              6 months ago

              Who is using it as excuse for the current genocide?

              You did, when you said “Genocide is a US problem not specific to any president.”

              When comparing 2 candidates, genocide doesn’t matter because they will both do it

              This “lesser of two evils” logic only holds up when deciding who to vote for. The Biden administration does not get to aid a genocide criticism-free just because Trump would be worse.

              Once a president is in office then you can protest decision

              A president is in office now, aiding a genocide now, so I’m protesting now. If the US is still supporting genocide after the election I will protest then, too.

              i’m not a trumper but biden is commiting genocide" is just pedantic and missing the point

              I saw a shocking amount of upvoted genocide denial in the comments, so I felt the need to respond, even if its unpopular.

              • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Haha you’re not protesting, youre whining on the internet. Not one protest in the US besides the students protesting their school, not biden.

                • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I assume the rest of your life based on like ten internet posts you’ve made. I’m a genius please pat me on the back’

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              6 months ago

              But while many media outlets were quick to report on the case not moving forward, they largely missed a key aspect of the ruling: the judge did not dismiss the case on its merits but rather because it fell ​“outside the court’s limited jurisdiction,” source

              In fact, U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey White’s statement appeared to uphold some of plaintiff’s key charges in the case:

              The judge went further, urging Biden and his administration officials to scrutinize ​“the results of their unflagging support” for the Israeli government’s assault on Gaza.

              Until he changes his stance, he’s “genocide Joe.”

              • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                So by that definition there’s also genocide Trump, and genocide US government, and genocide US soldiers, and genocide US citizens, and genocide judges, and… It becomes irrelevant to call him “genocide joe”, it has little to do with him. See we call Dwayne “the rock” Johnson because he’s the only wrestler known by that name, it’s unique to him. I think you need to lookup what Nicknames are for, aside from GOP propaganda.

                • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I agree. All individuals and institutions you listed could be culpable, but no suits, internationally, nor domestically have been filed. Except for the CCR case against Biden, Blinken, and Austin.

                  I looked into the origin of the “genocide Joe” meme. The earliest entry is from October 18, 2023. As far as I can tell it was started by pro-Palestine leftists like Aaron Mate, Hasan, and Alan Macleod. It did not originate from conservative media.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        this article does nothing to change my mind

        Nobody claimed you could read

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nice little performance! But your act isn’t all that convincing really.

        Joe Biden cares more about Palestinians than you do. He’s doing things to help while you’re projecting faux outrage.

  • suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    If Trump wins and has his SS start shooting Pro-Palestinian protestors, it’ll be really hard to hold back from saying “told you so”

    • m13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re just telling on yourself that you’re a fascist at heart then.

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why is it that everybody with a differing opinion than yours is called a fascist? The word does not mean what you think it means and by using it in this manner, you’re making the word lose its meaning.

        How about bringing real discussion to this thread instead of whatever this is?

        • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is smelling a lot like the republican “Not everything you don’t like is racist/fascist”

          How different is the person with the gun to the person who is standing nearby saying “you deserve this”?

          • Fades@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            What the fuck is this abuser talk? Nowhere did they say anything about deserving it, you are projecting your emotions here.

            What they DID say was it’d be difficult to not say I told you so, as in, I told you your choices would lead here. ‘You fucked up and now we’re here’ is a far cry from ‘you deserved it’.

            • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Standing by and saying told you so isn’t even that different to “you deserve it” if you aren’t stepping in to help prevent it.

  • suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    FYI: Most of those braindead “am I not allowed to criticize Biden???” comments and posts on social media are a concerted effort by right-wingers from /pol and other such sewers, trying to get people to not vote against Trump. Don’t fall for it. These aren’t “lefties” or “tankies”. Just downvote, report, and ignore.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’re insane if the think I wouldn’t crawl over 5 miles of glass covered in diarrhea to vote against christofascism, and the only way to vote against christofascism is by voting for the side with the best chance to claim its victory, and much to my chagrin that’s Biden, it’s a really simple calculus

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        correct. this is not the time to win the fight, this is the time to make sure we will be able to continue fighting it.

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Quite often when someone loudly whines about “not being able to criticize [X]” it’s because they have an opinion that is either repugnant, hateful or ridiculous and nobody wants to hear them. Nobody is saying they can’t or aren’t allowed to have criticism or opinions, but everyone else has a right to ignore or ridicule them for it.

      In the end, it’s usually just trolls. Giving them attention is what they want so it’s best to ignore them entirely and not give them the reaction they’re desperate for.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, I dont really care for Biden. Having said that, I’d rather gouge my eyes out with a rusty spoon than not vote for him and end up with Trump, so “genocide Joe” or whatever those morons are calling him begrudgingly has my vote.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    So where are all the “concerned Democrats” that always show up en masse to talk about how horrible Biden’s Gaza policy is?
    Aren’t you guy’s concerned about this policy too? Or is it fine because it’s not Biden’s policy?

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’re sick of hearing and talking about Trump, so they don’t want to talk about this stuff. They would rather film themselves crying about gEnOcIdE jOe on tiktok to make them feel better about themselves.

      Single issue voters hurt everyone.

      • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s the thing, Trump has been strategically quiet on the issue. He wants to make sure the spotlight is on Biden, even he is leaning into calling him genocide Joe.

        Trump knows this is a hot button issue, and if he were to speak out more on what his policy would be on it, he would very much unite the left against him. Letting Biden take the heat ensures the left is fractured.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Trump has been strategically quiet on the issue

          He’s been very loud, but not nearly as loud as the articles about his time in the SDNY courtroom over hooker hush money payments.

          The issue is that he’s not President while Biden is. So hypothesizing what a future President Trump might do in the event Biden’s approval rating sinks any lower becomes a more compelling Conservative Democrat talking point than what Biden is currently doing to cost him all that support.

          Letting Biden take the heat ensures the left is fractured.

          The left isn’t fractured on this issue. That’s the root of Biden’s problem. From the midwestern business-friendly liberals to the college Maoists, there’s a uniform horror and disgust towards our Middle East foreign policy. The only split is whether you’re willing to give Biden yet one more pass on our latest imperial atrocity or whether you’ve finally reached your limit.

          • Fades@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The only split is whether you’re willing to give Biden yet one more pass on our latest imperial atrocity or whether you’ve finally reached your limit.

            when you boil everything down to black and white, the nuance is gone along with any wisdom you started out with. Shame that’s all you got, can’t even hold an intelligent discussion without you leaping for the hyperbole.

            For instance, what country is doing more than the US to bring aid to Gaza?

            • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Every single one that currently supports the UNRWA, countries that have criticized Israel and stopped diplomacy with them or cut off trade, South Africa launched the ICC case against them, ones that have tried to vote for sanctions against them in the UN or have supported a Palestinian state. So ya, tons of countries that aren’t the US.

              • Fades@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Meanwhile the US is the only reason Gaza is getting any real aid at this point given all the other bullshit by both Hamas and the Zionist trash.

                But go ahead and look at the things you like and pretend everything else isn’t happening

                • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You can’t give the US credit for giving a little aid when they’re giving way more bombs and weapons. I’m not going to give you credit for throwing a bandaid to someone after you’re the one giving the shooter a gun and ammunition and stopped people from coming over to help when their shot. The US is causing more net harm in this whole situation. Also, those other countries ARE giving lots of aid. Look up the nationalities of the doctors and relief workers in there. They’re from all over the world. The US isn’t even donating to the UN relief org anymore because of trumped up accusations by Israel that haven’t even been proven, unlike lot of other countries that have resumed payments. You just hear about the US because they’re basically helping Israel hold the door shut, and every time they let it loose a little, aid can come in, which sounds like they did something good when it’s more like they stopped doing something bad. Hell, they’re supporting Israel while it blocks off aid through truck, which would be the one actual efficient way to deliver it (that little pier is doing barely anything and apparently even falling apart btw). One million people are being displaced right now. The President said they’d draw a red line in the sand before that happens, but operations have initiated in Rafah and nothing has happened.

                  So, if anyone is pretending that reality isn’t happening, it’s you. And tbh, I get it. It’s tough to reconcile good old America, innocent Israel, and grandpa Joe Biden with all the pictures of the dead Palestinian children and the rubble of their cities, put together with the proof of American bombs that are being used. It’s easier to not deal with it because our domestic problems are so big and no one here wants Trump to be President. But it’s happening, and you’ve got to face the problem so we can push our leaders to fix it, because it’s the US that are the ones causing it by shielding Israel from the rest of the world (except Germany), and we supposedly live in a democracy, where theoretically with enough popular support we should be able to pressure our politicians to change course on this disaster.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              when you boil everything down to black and white

              That is the nature of voting. You can either cast a ballot for a guy or not. There is no in-between state.

              what country is doing more than the US to bring aid to Gaza?

              UNRWA was the primary supplier of aid into Gaza until Israel kicked them out. Then the World Central Kitchen was a primary supplier of food aid, until Israel bombed it. Aid was coming in from Palestinians in Jordan and Egypt, until Israel sealed off the borders at gunpoint.

              Meanwhile, the US has been sending Israel more weapons used in these terrorist acts.

              Might as well credit Germany with feeding and housing Polish Jews in 1942.

              • Fades@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                No it is not the nature of voting, it is not a binary thing at all. Again all you do is remove all nuance which destroys the discussion

                You’re also proving my point, Israeli Zionists fucked aid and the US is the ONLY ONES doing ANYTHING to ensure aid gets there at our own cost. Meanwhile Egypt and neighboring countries simply put up barbed wire and close crossings.

                ALL those aids you listed you admit are no longer happening, only the US is now making it happen, but that’s not convenient to your position is it?

                Are you SERIOUSLY comparing the US to Nazi goddamn Germany right now? You are beyond a discussion based on reality. Won’t waste anymore time on you. Shame.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Israeli Zionists fucked aid and the US is the ONLY ONES doing ANYTHING

                  US is running cover for the Israeli Zionists, preventing UN-based aid from reaching Gaza, and doing clumsy ineffectual political stunts to disguise their complicity.

                  ALL those aids you listed you admit are no longer happening

                  Because the US is sending weapons into Israel to bomb aid agencies.

                  Are you SERIOUSLY comparing the US to Nazi

                  Wouldn’t even be the first time. From our re-installation of fascists in Japan and Germany during the post-war period to our Jakarta Method in Indonesia to the Contra terrorists we armed in El Salvador and Guatamala, this isn’t even our first full-throated fascist rodeo.

                  American fascism runs deep, and we’ve had a hard on for butchering every brown person we can get in our sites since at least 9/11.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    thanks again republicans for reminding us that expression of grievances is basically communism

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Former president Donald Trump promised to crush pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses, telling a roomful of donors — a group that he joked included “98 percent of my Jewish friends” — that he would expel student demonstrators from the United States, according to participants in the roundtable event with him in New York.

    When one of the donors complained that many of the students and professors protesting on campuses could one day hold positions of power in the United States, Trump called the demonstrators part of a “radical revolution” that he vowed to defeat.

    Several influential Republican donors, including Miriam Adelson, have pressed Trump to publicly express support not only for Israel but also for Netanyahu, its embattled leader.

    He also recalled that he had “a bad experience with Bibi,” claiming that Israel had planned to participate in the 2020 U.S. strike that killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani but backed out at the last minute.

    Trump and Netanyahu’s relationship will “continue to prosper and flourish” if they’re both in office at the same time again, Matthew Brooks, chief executive of the Republican Jewish Coalition, said in an interview.

    The group watched gruesome footage of the Oct. 7 attack and toured parts of the country where Israelis had been killed or kidnapped, making for an “educational visit that was life-changing,” McMullen said.


    The original article contains 1,592 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 86%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The people who need to see this will instead shut their eyes and cry gEnOcIdE jOe!!!

    • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They could both be doing genocides you know. It doesn’t make Biden’s lack of response and continual support of Israel good, and it deserves to be criticized.