Blowjobs are not natural, eating pussy is not natural and anal sex is not natural either.
Only unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is 100% natural because it’s the only form of sex that has the potential to create a child. All other forms of sex like blowjob, eating pussy and anal sex do not have the potential to create a child. And protected penile- vaginal intercourse is also not natural because condoms did not exist 1000’s of years ago.
That why I only consider unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse to be the only natural form of sex everything else is not natural in my opinion.
But just because I think that blowjobs, eating pussy and anal sex is not natural that doesn’t mean that I think that people who engage in those types of sex activities with consenting adults is morally wrong because it is not morally wrong in my opinion because those sexual activities are completely harmless if it between consenting adults.
Ummm… Ok??? Is there a point to any of this?
I mean it’s factually wrong, unless you consider actions that can be found in a large number of other animals, “not natural” (giraffes and alligators are homosexual sluts lol, and penguins often mate for life with others of the same sex), but, regardless of if it’s factually wrong or not…
What is the point of your post?
Just a low effort troll, nothing new or special.
The point of this post is for me to give my opinion on why I think unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is the only form of sex that is 100% natural in my opinion.
This post has nothing to do with homosexual relationships being unnatural because I also think straight couple that engage in the sexual activities that doesn’t involve unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is also not natural.
For example If a guy is eating out a woman pussy or performing anal sex with her. I would consider that to be not natural because the form of sex activities that they’re doing together doesn’t have the potential to create a child.
Hypothetically speaking if homosexual intercourse had the potential to create a child then I would consider that to be 100% natural in my opinion.
I have nothing against homosexual intercourse. Seriously even though I don’t think that it’s natural. Homosexual intercourse is still not morally wrong as long as it between two consenting adults. Because what they’re are doing is completely harmless.
What does this has anything to do with lgbqt+ community? Its a pretty weird place to put such “opinions” on…
I made this post to explain why not all heterosexual intercourse is 100% natural.
If a woman pegs a guy with a strap on that is not natural in my opinion because that sexual activity does not have the potential to create a child.
Many homophobic people will say that homosexual intercourse is morally wrong because it’s not natural and my counter argument to that is that not all heterosexual intercourse is natural either. Only heterosexual intercourse that involves unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is 100% natural. So their argument about homosexual intercourse being morally wrong because it’s not natural is not a valid argument in my opinion for why homosexual intercourse between two consenting adults is morally wrong or not.