Blowjobs are not natural, eating pussy is not natural and anal sex is not natural either.

Only unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is 100% natural because it’s the only form of sex that has the potential to create a child. All other forms of sex like blowjob, eating pussy and anal sex do not have the potential to create a child. And protected penile- vaginal intercourse is also not natural because condoms did not exist 1000’s of years ago.

That why I only consider unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse to be the only natural form of sex everything else is not natural in my opinion.

But just because I think that blowjobs, eating pussy and anal sex is not natural that doesn’t mean that I think that people who engage in those types of sex activities with consenting adults is morally wrong because it is not morally wrong in my opinion because those sexual activities are completely harmless if it between consenting adults.

  • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I made this post to explain why not all heterosexual intercourse is 100% natural.

    If a woman pegs a guy with a strap on that is not natural in my opinion because that sexual activity does not have the potential to create a child.

    Many homophobic people will say that homosexual intercourse is morally wrong because it’s not natural and my counter argument to that is that not all heterosexual intercourse is natural either. Only heterosexual intercourse that involves unprotected penile- vaginal intercourse is 100% natural. So their argument about homosexual intercourse being morally wrong because it’s not natural is not a valid argument in my opinion for why homosexual intercourse between two consenting adults is morally wrong or not.