In short: Queensland has a range of roadside cameras to detect offences such as speeding, mobile phone use, and not wearing a seatbelt.
The government has significantly revised how much it expects to make from cameras with revenue in 2023-24 tipped to fall $94 million short.
What’s next? The cameras are now projected to make $409 million in 2023-24, followed by $465.8 million in 2024-25.

Brace yourself for a reduction in tolerance. Government relies on that speed camera income so if there’s a shortfall they’ll stop dropping the percent tolerances until we hit the 1kph over fines they hand out in Victoria.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well, that’s better than I thought, thanks for the correct, I hope, but still bad if one wants traffic to move (I’m more interested in bikes moving personally, but whatever…)

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      but still bad if one wants traffic to move

      No it’s not. The most important thing for keeping traffic moving is making sure people drive consistently and predictably. It’s when people slam the brakes (or even feather the brakes, if the person following them is too close) that you end up with traffic jams. A difference of a few km/h in the maximum speed you can be travelling without getting fined isn’t a relevant factor.

    • John Bruzzolini
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It used to ± 10% but the ADRs were changed somewhere in the '00s (2006, I think).