• Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Management is ordering pizza for the office and sends around a sheet asking what everyone wants.

      The third-party voter is the last one to get the sheet.

      There are 10 votes for pepperoni and 9 votes for cheese.

      The third party voter hates pepperoni, and thinks cheese is a bit boring, so he votes for the anchovies in his heart.

      He has wasted his vote since cheese would be vastly preferable to him than pepperoni, and anchovies had no realistic chance of winning. That’s why everyone thinks third party voters are ridiculous.

      • distantsounds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        To make this more realistic:

        Management decides that the pizza choices are: sardines or anchovies.

        The workers employees want pepperoni, but that’s not an option management allows because they are in the fishing business

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          The workers want

          God, I wonder if some people have ever even talked to other US voters in their lifetime.

              • distantsounds@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                4 months ago

                Anyway you try to spin it, apologizing for aiding a state engaged an active genocide is really not a positive

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  20
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  No, it’s not. But “I’m going to give power to the guy who wants to offer unlimited support to Israel’s genocide AND start a few genocides at home too, as well as abolishing what democracy we do have in this country and selling out Ukrainians to be genocided by Russia” is not really an alternative that should be taken seriously.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              4 months ago

              Oooh a poll! Shall we see if it was funded by a right wing org? Any guesses as to the methodology? 20 participants? Maybe 200?! gasp dare we dream . . . 1000?!

              That stuff isn’t usually in the articles for a reason

              • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                It’s Gallup, Gallup is generally reliable.

                The issue is that most people do not put a great deal of thought into foreign policy, and thus often have very contradictory views - such as when most American voters approved of a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine after the first days of the war, but if asked if they would support a No-Fly Zone if it had the risk of US jets shooting down Russian planes (you know, exactly what a no-fly zone IS), half of those supporting swapped their opinion.

                • Optional@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Gallup is generally reliable, for a pollster, so I looked:

                  Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted March 1-20, 2024, with a random sample of 1,016 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.

                  Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 80% cellphone respondents and 20% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods.

                  So, war-dialing and hoping (a) the person picks up (b) the person doesn’t hang up immediately © wants to give their opinion for 20 questions, and (d) yes 1,000 people out of 80 million voters. Also it was two months ago.

                  Not to mention, the headline is “Approve of Israel’s actions” not “Understands what diplomatic and political issues are involved”.

                  That’s like the message being “95% of people want ice cream for dinner, so vote out mom & dad and let’s go with the guy in the creepy van”

              • distantsounds@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                4 months ago

                Where’s the poll that suggests people are ok with the Biden administration’s approach in Israel? Are there ANY polls that support it?

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I see you didn’t actually read the poll I replied with. Here, let me help you out:

                  U.S. adults are divided about whether Biden is favoring the Israelis too much (22%), favoring the Palestinians too much (16%) or striking the right balance (21%) on the Israel-Hamas war. Fully 40% say they are not sure.

                  • distantsounds@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I did read it, and I may have arrived at a different conclusion than you.

                    Would you say any of those percentages add up to, “Yes, supporting the active genocide is worth supporting.” ??

    • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Voting third party also denies the reality of Fitrst Past the Post, and perpetual and well documented trend and reinforcement of duopolies.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        The duopole is not a law of nature. It is a psychological effect that the DNC and Reps keep pushing, so you never dare to think outside that box. It is the same like with stock market hypes and crashes. Everybody keeps repeating how they think the system inadvertly works, even though it has not to. Everybody that is not a fascist genocidal mass murderer could agree on one third Party and kick the DNC and Reps asses. But thanks to people telling them it is impossible, you believe it to be impossible. You are gaslighting yourself thanks to your political leaders sucessfully gaslighting you.

        This generation of Americans will go down in history with failures like Chamberlain and his appeasement policies. Sucking up to whoever they can, devoid of any will to improve things or demand dignity.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            But but but! It’s always been the Democrats and Republicans fault. Even though it’s always been this way. Even before recent changes in both parties. Even though it was this way before those parties even existed! /s

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            4 months ago

            Man if only there was some alternative to the British Crown taking all the taxes in the Colonies and some sort of self determination for the people.

            You have your souls crushed like the people in Sovjet Russia. The system has no alternative. Obey the system. Stop dreaming. Stop demanding a better future. The system has no alternative. Obey the system.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Oh, I’m sorry, here I didn’t realize “Don’t let fascism immediately win in this election because numerous possibilities and LIVES are extinguished by fascism” was the denial of all work towards other possibilities.

              • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                4 months ago

                So what was the last election? And what was the election before that? This is the third time now i’m hearing. “This is the election where democracy is on the line. Otherwise we get fascism. Now is not the time to look outside the system…” And you will hear the exact same thing next election again. And then again and then again. All the while the DNC will move to whatever the Reps stood for the cycle before. Remember all the fuzz about Trumps Wall? Well Biden is building it. You think all the stuff about Trans people or the whole nonsense about furries or whatever will be exclusive to the Reps? The Dems will blow into the same horn in a few years, because enough of their white middle class voter base will have been eroded by their economic policies and need a scapegoat.

                We see the same shit with “center” and “center left” all over the world becoming more and more fascist. And the Dems already started far right with some gay rights sprinkled in between. But please lets have the same argument in four years, with the goalposts being moved about what we should just accept as the “lesser” evil.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  “This is the election where democracy is on the line. Otherwise we get fascism. Now is not the time to look outside the system…”

                  Yes, it turns out that if you don’t work on things between each election, you get the same issue that you had to deal with last election. But sure - vote in fascism this time! That way you won’t have to worry about having this little conundrum next election. :)

                  All the while the DNC will move to whatever the Reps stood for the cycle before.

                  Are you fucking serious.

                  Please compare the 2012 and 2024 Dem platforms, and get back to me.

                  Remember all the fuzz about Trumps Wall? Well Biden is building it.

                  lol

                  10$ says this is the “The money and legislation had already been pushed through but Biden didn’t use the power he didn’t have to unilaterally stop it” incident.

                  You think all the stuff about Trans people or the whole nonsense about furries or whatever will be exclusive to the Reps? The Dems will blow into the same horn in a few years, because enough of their white middle class voter base will have been eroded by their economic policies and need a scapegoat.

                  Do you…

                  do you not remember what the Dem Party was like on trans rights before the modern day

                  Fuck’s sake.

                  We see the same shit with “center” and “center left” all over the world becoming more and more fascist. And the Dems already started far right with some gay rights sprinkled in between. But please lets have the same argument in four years, with the goalposts being moved about what we should just accept as the “lesser” evil.

                  Cool. Your proposed solution, for this situation, right now, without resorting to “Everyone will magically convert to my ideology in the next six months”?

                  • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Cool. Your proposed solution, for this situation, right now, without resorting to “Everyone will magically convert to my ideology in the next six months”?

                    So you are saying, that the American people are by their heart genocidal mass murderers and colonialists, who enjoy not having healthcare and being crushed by rising costs of living while wages stagnate? That is what you are implying with claiming being against that is “ideological” and again you do exactly what the DNC, Reps and their rich “donors” aka corrupters want. You fight to maintain your own oppression instead of fighting against your oppressors.

            • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I slightly misspoke, how certain voting systems devolve into lesser evil voting. FPTP always devolves a 2 party system but something like STV or Ranked Choice open up the field to many more options with little downside.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Everybody that is not a fascist genocidal mass murderer could agree on one third Party and kick the DNC and Reps asses.

          Oh, was it that easy all along? Cool, which third party are Democrats and Republicans going to agree on? After all, the voters secretly agree on all the issues, it’s just the mean ol’ representatives stopping us from coming together and singing kumbaya. 😊

        • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          “duopoly is not a law of nature”, is very, very incorrect. It is simply human nature. Market at work. Same Reason there are two “sodas” in any given area with anything else an also ran. Two big players. Just how it works when unregulated.

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            And the FPTP system is a law of nature? God decided in the US there can only be FPTP, while other countries have different voting systems?

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Aw, sorry, in the future, I’ll be sure to give third-party voters plenty of asspats for welcoming fascism.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes because unfortunately the voting system of your country is broken. It’s not your fault, but you have to deal with the consequences of that.

    • icydefiance@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Any third party that a left leaning person might vote for will only help Republicans to win elections by siphoning votes away from Democrats.

      In fact, that’s exactly why they exist.

      So yeah, they get hate, because they’re actively trying to sabotage progressive causes and usher in fascism.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Myself? None. As I have said I am most likely voting Biden if he manages to survive. I supported Uncommitted vote in the primary because that was an opportunity for a concerted and focused effort with a direct policy message.

        There are only a few instances and time windows for shaping the policies that the parties and candidates run on. That was one of those times. The next time will be during the conventions this summer.

        After that we will indeed be stuck with whatever shit is left on the table to vote for in the General election. At that point nonvoters and third party voters alike will indeed have to grapple with the choices and risks they’ll make. That is when they’ll have to put their money where their mouth is.

        But resigning ourselves to that now is premature, if not actually a tacit support for the status quo.

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Voting third party has the same effect on the outcome as not voting. From the last presidential election, there were 24 times more nonvoters than third part voters.

      They blame third parties to suppress their ideas, not because of the negligible effect on the outcome.

      The 33% of eligible voters who chose not to vote could have swung the 2020 election if they voted.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Well put: third party voters are often policy focused if not single-issue (and/or extreme). Which paints a target on themselves because the alternative is reaching out to non-voters. And that requires looking into why people don’t vote or what depresses voter turnout.