I never got around to watching it when it came out, and I think I’d completely missed the critical reception and box-office failure it received. Which saddened me to read after the watch, I have to say, as I was really happy to have watched it.

For those who don’t know the film, I personally liked Roger Ebert’s review (with whom I generally vibed). It was polarising, and genuinely confusing if you want to “understand” a film, while also potentially being vacuous and overwrought. I’m not going to say it was a good film or recommend it to people. If it’s for you, you’ll know. All I’ll say is that it was, for me, a very good kind of film and generally well executed. Some ambitious film ideas and high level or broad concepts put to screen pretty full-throttle.

I haven’t seen a film in this general category of viewing experience for a while (probably entirely on me). Last probably would have been 3000 Years of Longing and maybe Twin Peaks S3 (I count that as an 18 hr film), and then Aronofsky’s The Fountain (to which Cloud Atlas is probably the closest sibling I can think of).

Without getting nostalgic about films or critical of the current era (I’m not on top of film enough to do that) … I was certainly reminded that I need to revise my film/TV diet. It re-affirmed for me a sense that films are more powerful than TV and that this era of TV has been productionised in a way that seems to suck the art of it.

As for what the film was actually about, I think it’s much like 2001 A Space Odyssey, it’s both obvious and confused/inexplicable. I’m sure there’s a whole technical breakdown one could read or endeavour to create oneself, but I’m happy to have watched it once and perhaps revisit it again later to try to pick up on all of the connections I’m guessing they wove through the film, in large part because I think that’s in line with the spirit of the film which I’m happy to embrace.


Beyond all of that, but kinda connected I think, was to reminisce about the Wachowskis’ career, where whatever their flaws, I think I prefer them making things to not … there’s a certain essence of good-hearted and ambitious geek-dom to their stuff that I’m just happy to watch (including Jupiter Ascending and Matrix 4).

  • spudsrus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s my favourite movie but people either seem to love or hate it.

    Started reading the book afterwards but didn’t make it through the second half of the post apocalypse future story.

    Usually recommend it to people since very few have seen it

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      people either seem to love or hate it.

      This should be normalised more IMO. Even sought after. Usually it’s a sign that there’s something special in it if you’re one of the people that are going to like it … and that should be treasured.

      I said it in another reply … subjective art is awesome!


      Curious how you feel about The Fountain … as that was the most similar film I could think of.

      • spudsrus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        2006 release?

        Haven’t seen it but I’ll check it out and get back to you!

        • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fountain

          Speaking of which, I’m just cooking up an idea of running a sort of watch club here, where something like this could be an ideal candidate, at least for a sort of “out there, somewhat experimental sci-fi cinema watch club”.

          Do you have any thoughts on whether that’d be something you or others would be interested in?