• Baku
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    For anyone else who isn’t a yank:

    The 4th amendment is (meant to) protect against unreasonable searches and seizures.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      May as well not exist, tbh. That amendment gets infringed on so many times by police, it’s not even funny.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        happen to have a lot of cash on you? yeeeeah we’re just gonna take that. you can sue the government (haha) and maybe you’ll get it back in a few years. we’re gonna use it to juice our slush,er, benevolent order of police funding, and uh, I dunno, buy an APC and a helicopter.

        and a ton of weapons.

        oh yeah, the federal gov gives us APCs and helos surplus, shit, well, let’s paaaaaaarty

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That “probable cause” loophole is lame as hell.

          Probable cause, got flaws like dirty drawers

          Meet me at the corner store so we can start the street wars