• Greyghoster
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    36,000 tons a year and how energy is needed to sequester this piddling mount of CO2? Leaving the pre-sequestered stuff on n the ground is definitely cheaper. Bring on the carbon tax.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I shared the article because it is relevant to this community but I personally do not like carbon capture. You don’t need to capture what you don’t create

      • Greyghoster
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thanks for the article. Your thoughts are probably similar to mine in that carbon capture probably is part of the solution but it’s hard to see how the volume of CO2 captured can be ramped up enough to be meaningful. It is certainly meaningless if we don’t stop burning fossil fuels.