no banana @lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 months agoflanged rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1258arrow-down10
arrow-up1258arrow-down1imageflanged rulelemmy.worldno banana @lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 months agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squareAussiemandeuslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoMore so for defending yourself against multiple people or holding a bridge head
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoThe only time a fighter can be assumed to win with even 2 to 1 odds is with a significant material and training advantage. And they’d still be better off with a weapon that isn’t a gimmick.
minus-squareAussiemandeuslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoOh you so mighty and knowledgeable in the martial arts teach us your wisdom
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoSure thing. A good big man beats a good small man. Two men beat one man. You’re welcome buddy.
More so for defending yourself against multiple people or holding a bridge head
The only time a fighter can be assumed to win with even 2 to 1 odds is with a significant material and training advantage. And they’d still be better off with a weapon that isn’t a gimmick.
Oh you so mighty and knowledgeable in the martial arts teach us your wisdom
Sure thing.
A good big man beats a good small man.
Two men beat one man.
You’re welcome buddy.