• Pup Biru
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    i always say to americans: medicare keeps you alive and able to be productive, private insurance keeps you comfortable

    … but medicare also drastically reduces private premiums

    • palitu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ah yeah, that is a good way of putting it.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I very much appreciate your last sentence.

      Medicare is a sad shell of its former self, good luck seeing a GP or a specialist for free these days. Want a specialist to check out your breasts? That’ll be $400 for the first visit and $210 out of pocket for all your follow ups, $800 (out of pocket) just for a biopsy if you need it. (Rough numbers from a friend). And consider that most women develop some kind of breast growths in their life time.

      Sure it’s not US levels of price gouging, but heck. Medicare is being lost and we’re not fighting for it.

      I won’t be satisfied until private health is dead. Fuck private health.

      • Pup Biru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        i wouldn’t say until private health is dead: there’s always a certain level of comfort or pseudo-science choice that i don’t think should be socialised… for example, my private health covers “alternative therapies” which should certainly not be covered by social healthcare, but people should be given the option to spend their money on that if they want to

        same thing with private rooms, better hospital meals, etc: these things should be optional extras that you can pay more for

        with that said, dental, optical, psychology, physio, and nutrition are all things that my private health covers that medicare should cover or should cover more

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh yeah, that’s true (the alternative therapies), and for extras that aren’t at all better medical care

          • Pup Biru
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            yup:

            public is for keeping as many people as healthy as possible as efficiently as possible: it’s about optimisation

            private is for things that you want but don’t need that would make the care of others less efficient without additional money, and where you can pay for that extra why not allow people to insure for it?